ArticleMedical physics2014
An in-vivo investigation of the therapeutic effect of pulsed focused ultrasound on tumor growth.
Article in Medical physics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeHigh-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has been investigated for ablative therapy and drug enhancement for gene therapy and chemotherapy. The aim of this work is to explore the feasibility of pulsed focused ultrasound (pFUS) for cancer therapy using an in vivo animal model.
methodsA clinical HIFU system (InSightec ExAblate 2000) integrated with a 1.5 T GE MR scanner was used in this study. Suitable ultrasound parameters were investigated to perform nonthermal sonications, keeping the temperature elevation below 4 °C as measured in real time by MR thermometry. LNCaP cells (10(6)) were injected into the prostates of male mice (n = 20). When tumors reached a diameter of about 5 mm in 3D as measured on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the tumor-bearing mice (n = 8) were treated with pFUS (1 MHz frequency; 25 W acoustic power; 0.1 duty cycle; 60 s duration). A total of 4-6 sonications were used to cover the entire tumor volume under MR image guidance. The animals were allowed to survive for 4 weeks after the treatment. The tumor growth was monitored on high-resolution (0.2 mm) MRI weekly post treatment and was compared with that of the control group (n = 12).
resultsSignificant tumor growth delay was observed in the tumor-bearing mice treated with pFUS. The mean tumor volume for the pFUS treated mice remained the same 1 week after the treatment while the mean tumor volume of the control mice grew 42% over the same time. Two weeks after the pFUS treatment, the control group had a mean tumor volume 40% greater than that of the treated group. There was a greater variation in tumor volume at 4 weeks post treatment for both treated and control mice and a slightly faster tumor growth for the pFUS treated mice.
conclusionsThe authors' results demonstrated that pFUS may have a great potential for cancer therapy. Further experiments are warranted to understand the predominantly nonthermal cell killing mechanisms of pFUS and to derive optimal ultrasound parameters and fractionation schemes to maximize the therapeutic effect of pFUS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.