Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25471820›Full record

ArticlePsychology & health2015

An observational study of social control, mood, and self-efficacy in couples during treatment for head and neck cancer.

Hoda Badr, Chi Yeung, Megan A Lewis, Kathrin Milbury, William H Redd

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology & health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06991673 (Adolescent Surgery Roadmap Feasibility and Acceptability Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06991673 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Adolescent Surgery Roadmap Feasibility and Acceptability Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MichiganRan2025 to 2029Enrolled100ConditionsPediatric Surgical ProceduresArmsBehavioral Treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hoda Badra Department of Oncological Sciences , Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York NY , USA.
Chi Yeung
Megan A Lewis
Kathrin Milbury
William H Redd
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USRTI International · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Research and Mentoring in Psychosocial OncologyK05CA108955 · NCI · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI REDD, WILLIAM H · 2004 to 2013
$1.5M
Spousal Support, Emotional Disclosure, and Adjustment to Head and Neck CancerK07CA124668 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BADR, HODA J. · 2008 to 2012
$779k
Couple-Based Mind-Body Program for Lung Cancer Patients and their PartnersK01AT007559 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI MILBURY, KATHRIN · 2013 to 2017
$652k
NCCIH NIH HHS K01 AT007559NCI NIH HHS K05 CA108955NCI NIH HHS K05CA108955NCI NIH HHS K07 CA124668NCI NIH HHS K07CA124668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHead and neck cancer (HNC) patients experience debilitating side effects, including abnormally reduced salivation and difficulty swallowing. Intensive self-care protocols are prescribed to control side effects and minimise discomfort, but non-adherence rates are high. Although spouses are in a prime position to encourage adherence, studies have yet to examine how spouse social control (i.e. attempts to influence patient behaviour to support adherence) affects HNC patient mood and self-efficacy for engaging in these self-care routines.

methodsOne-hundred twenty-five HNC couples, where the patient (86% male) was undergoing radiotherapy, were recorded in the laboratory as they discussed a cancer-related issue that the patient identified as being a topic of concern.

resultsSixty-eight couples discussed side effects and spouses engaged in social control in 61 of these discussions. Although oral complications and pain were frequently identified by patients as being topics of concern, dental/oral care and pain management were some of the least likely self-care behaviours to be targeted by spouses, who focused primarily on encouraging patients to maintain their weight and hydration. Although spouses engaged in an almost equal number of positive and negative control attempts, only positive control was significantly (p < .05) associated with patient positive mood and self-efficacy.

conclusionHNC couples may benefit from programmes that emphasise the regular practise of self-care routines to control oral side effects, pain and nutrition/hydration problems. Likewise, programmes that encourage spouses to maximise their use of positive social control may also boost patients' mood during treatment and empower them to engage in recommended self-care behaviours.

Indexed as

AffectInterpersonal RelationsSelf EfficacyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDental CareFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedObservational Studies as TopicPain ManagementSelf CareSpousescoupleshead and neck cancermoodself-efficacyself-managementsocial control

Identifiers

PMID25471820
PMCPMC4414685
OpenAlexW2061163627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.