Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25471791›Full record

SynthesisMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2015

Metabolic syndrome in hematologic malignancies survivors: a meta-analysis.

Chunyan Li, Pengcheng Liu, Lu Liu, Xiaoli Zhang, Peng Yang, Hui Sheng, Le Bu, Hong Li, Shen Qu

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Metabolic Syndrome and Cardiovascular Disease after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Screening and Preventive Practice Recommendations from the CIBMTR and EBMT.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2016
    Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Insulin and cancer: a tangled web.The Biochemical journal · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chunyan LiDepartment of Endocrinology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, No. 301, Yanchang Road, Shanghai, China.
Pengcheng Liu
Lu Liu
Xiaoli Zhang
Peng Yang
Hui Sheng
Le Bu
Hong Li
Shen Qu
Tongji University · CNShanghai Tenth People's Hospital · CNNanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The results from the published studies on whether the risk of metabolic syndrome is high among hematologic malignancies survivors are conflicting. The aims of this study are to conduct a systematic search and assess the literature to determine the available evidence on the association between metabolic syndrome and hematologic malignancies. Two reviewers independently conducted a systemic search to identify the available evidence from PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane database from database inception to June 4, 2014. The articles were limited to human studies and published in English. A combined analysis was performed, followed by a subgroup analyses stratified by the type of hematologic malignancies, hematologic malignancies treatment modality, criteria of metabolic syndrome, and individual components of metabolic syndrome. Publication bias was assessed using the Begg and Egger's tests and visual inspection of funnel plot. All analysis was performed using Stata SE version 10.0 software package. Seven cross-sectional studies with a total of 3,550 participants were included in the analysis. Compared with the healthy control groups, the hematologic malignancies survivors were at an increased risk of metabolic syndrome, in the random-effect meta-analysis of all seven cross-sectional studies (OR 2.03; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.23-3.35; I (2) = 43.9 %). In the subgroup meta-analysis by cancer treatment modality, a significant positive association was observed for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (OR 2.40; 95 % CI 1.71-3.35). However, no significant positive association was observed for other major cancer treatment modality, including chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Further subgroup analysis by individual metabolic syndrome components showed that the risk of high blood pressure among hematologic malignancies survivors (OR 1.67; 95 % CI 1.10-2.53) was found to be higher compared with central obesity (OR 1.43; 95 % CI 1.02-2.01), whereas no significant association between hematologic malignancies survivors and other individual components including high glucose levels, high triglyceride levels, and low HDL cholesterol levels was observed. Funnel plot inspection and Begg and Egger's tests showed no evidence of publication bias for combined analysis. Our meta-analysis of studies showed that hematologic malignancies survivors were at an increased risk of metabolic syndrome.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesHematologic NeoplasmsHumansMetabolic SyndromeRiskSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID25471791
OpenAlexW2168343632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.