Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25471691›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of immunology2015

Structural basis for ineffective T-cell responses to MHC anchor residue-improved "heteroclitic" peptides.

Florian Madura, Pierre J Rizkallah, Christopher J Holland, Anna Fuller, Anna Bulek, Andrew J Godkin, Andrea J Schauenburg, David K Cole, Andrew K Sewell

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Defining and Studying B Cell Receptor and TCR Interactions.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Peptide-based vaccine for cancer therapies.Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Tumor rejection properties of gp100Molecular immunology · 2021
    Article
  16. Structures suggest an approach for converting weak self-peptide tumor antigens into superagonists for CD8 T cells in cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Structurally silent peptide anchor modifications allosterically modulate T cell recognition in a receptor-dependent manner.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Florian MaduraDivision of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
Pierre J Rizkallah
Christopher J Holland
Anna Fuller
Anna Bulek
Andrew J Godkin
Andrea J Schauenburg
David K Cole
Andrew K Sewell
Cardiff University · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H001085/1Wellcome Trust 100327Wellcome Trust WT095767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MHC anchor residue-modified "heteroclitic" peptides have been used in many cancer vaccine trials and often induce greater immune responses than the wild-type peptide. The best-studied system to date is the decamer MART-1/Melan-A26-35 peptide, EAAGIGILTV, where the natural alanine at position 2 has been modified to leucine to improve human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A*0201 anchoring. The resulting ELAGIGILTV peptide has been used in many studies. We recently showed that T cells primed with the ELAGIGILTV peptide can fail to recognize the natural tumor-expressed peptide efficiently, thereby providing a potential molecular reason for why clinical trials of this peptide have been unsuccessful. Here, we solved the structure of a TCR in complex with HLA-A*0201-EAAGIGILTV peptide and compared it with its heteroclitic counterpart , HLA-A*0201-ELAGIGILTV. The data demonstrate that a suboptimal anchor residue at position 2 enables the TCR to "pull" the peptide away from the MHC binding groove, facilitating extra contacts with both the peptide and MHC surface. These data explain how a TCR can distinguish between two epitopes that differ by only a single MHC anchor residue and demonstrate how weak MHC anchoring can enable an induced-fit interaction with the TCR. Our findings constitute a novel demonstration of the extreme sensitivity of the TCR to minor alterations in peptide conformation.

Indexed as

AlanineAmino Acid SequenceAmino Acid SubstitutionCrystallography, X-RayEpitopes, T-LymphocyteEscherichia coliGene ExpressionHLA-A2 AntigenHumansLeucineMART-1 AntigenModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataPeptidesProtein BindingProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsAlanineEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHLA-A*02:01 antigenHLA-A2 AntigenLeucineMART-1 AntigenPeptidesReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-betaRecombinant ProteinsCross-reactivityCrystal structureMART-1Melan-AMelanomaPeptide-major histocompatibility complexSurface plasmon resonanceT-cellTCR

Identifiers

PMID25471691
PMCPMC4357396
OpenAlexW2121487020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.