Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25470738›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Controversies surrounding segments and parasegments in onychophora: insights from the expression patterns of four "segment polarity genes" in the peripatopsid Euperipatoides rowelli.

Franziska Anni Franke, Georg Mayer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Quantifying Evolutionary Dynamics of Arthropodization and Arthrodization.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review of extra-embryonic tissues in the closest arthropod relatives, onychophorans and tardigrades.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Extensive loss of Wnt genes in Tardigrada.BMC ecology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. EvoDevo · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The nervous and visual systems of onychophorans and tardigrades: learning about arthropod evolution from their closest relatives.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Franziska Anni FrankeAnimal Evolution & Development, Institute of Biology, University of Leipzig, Talstraße 33, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Georg MayerAnimal Evolution & Development, Institute of Biology, University of Leipzig, Talstraße 33, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Leipzig University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arthropods typically show two types of segmentation: the embryonic parasegments and the adult segments that lie out of register with each other. Such a dual nature of body segmentation has not been described from Onychophora, one of the closest arthropod relatives. Hence, it is unclear whether onychophorans have segments, parasegments, or both, and which of these features was present in the last common ancestor of Onychophora and Arthropoda. To address this issue, we analysed the expression patterns of the "segment polarity genes" engrailed, cubitus interruptus, wingless and hedgehog in embryos of the onychophoran Euperipatoides rowelli. Our data revealed that these genes are expressed in repeated sets with a specific anterior-to-posterior order along the body in embryos of E. rowelli. In contrast to arthropods, the expression occurs after the segmental boundaries have formed. Moreover, the initial segmental furrow retains its position within the engrailed domain throughout development, whereas no new furrow is formed posterior to this domain. This suggests that no re-segmentation of the embryo occurs in E. rowelli. Irrespective of whether or not there is a morphological or genetic manifestation of parasegments in Onychophora, our data clearly show that parasegments, even if present, cannot be regarded as the initial metameric units of the onychophoran embryo, because the expression of key genes that define the parasegmental boundaries in arthropods occurs after the segmental boundaries have formed. This is in contrast to arthropods, in which parasegments rather than segments are the initial metameric units of the embryo. Our data further revealed that the expression patterns of "segment polarity genes" correspond to organogenesis rather than segment formation. This is in line with the concept of segmentation as a result of concerted evolution of individual periodic structures rather than with the interpretation of 'segments' as holistic units.

Indexed as

Body PatterningGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsEmbryonic DevelopmentEmbryo, NonmammalianGene ExpressionHedgehog ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsMorphogenesisOrgan SpecificityPhylogenyTranscription FactorsWnt ProteinsHedgehog ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsTranscription FactorsWnt Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25470738
PMCPMC4255022
OpenAlexW2068345933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.