Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25470464›Full record

ArticleBiosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science

Interfacing a biosurveillance portal and an international network of institutional analysts to detect biological threats.

Flavia Riccardo, Mika Shigematsu, Catherine Chow, C Jason McKnight, Jens Linge, Brian Doherty, Maria Grazia Dente, Silvia Declich, Mike Barker, Philippe Barboza and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Identifying potential emerging threats through epidemic intelligence activities-looking for the needle in the haystack?International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Flavia Riccardo
Mika Shigematsu
Catherine Chow
C Jason McKnight
Jens Linge
Brian Doherty
Maria Grazia Dente
Silvia Declich
Mike Barker
Philippe Barboza
Laetitia Vaillant
Alastair Donachie
Abla Mawudeku
Michael Blench
Ray Arthur

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Early Alerting and Reporting (EAR) project, launched in 2008, is aimed at improving global early alerting and risk assessment and evaluating the feasibility and opportunity of integrating the analysis of biological, chemical, radionuclear (CBRN), and pandemic influenza threats. At a time when no international collaborations existed in the field of event-based surveillance, EAR's innovative approach involved both epidemic intelligence experts and internet-based biosurveillance system providers in the framework of an international collaboration called the Global Health Security Initiative, which involved the ministries of health of the G7 countries and Mexico, the World Health Organization, and the European Commission. The EAR project pooled data from 7 major internet-based biosurveillance systems onto a common portal that was progressively optimized for biological threat detection under the guidance of epidemic intelligence experts from public health institutions in Canada, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The group became the first end users of the EAR portal, constituting a network of analysts working with a common standard operating procedure and risk assessment tools on a rotation basis to constantly screen and assess public information on the web for events that could suggest an intentional release of biological agents. Following the first 2-year pilot phase, the EAR project was tested in its capacity to monitor biological threats, proving that its working model was feasible and demonstrating the high commitment of the countries and international institutions involved. During the testing period, analysts using the EAR platform did not miss intentional events of a biological nature and did not issue false alarms. Through the findings of this initial assessment, this article provides insights into how the field of epidemic intelligence can advance through an international network and, more specifically, how it was further developed in the EAR project.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksInternetAnthraxBiosurveillanceCanadaDatabases, FactualEuropeGlobal HealthHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaHumansInformation DisseminationInternational CooperationJapanPlaguePublic Health SurveillanceRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID25470464
PMCPMC4248243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.