ArticleThe Journal of clinical psychiatry2014
Dr. Mischoulon and colleagues reply.
Article in The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00101452 (A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Alternative Therapy S-Adenosyl-L-Methionine), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Alternative Therapy S-Adenosyl-L-Methionine (SAMe) vs Escitalopram in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- S-adenosyl methionine (SAMe) for depression in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Excess S-adenosylmethionine inhibits methylation via catabolism to adenine.Communications biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25470103What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.