Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25470067›Full record

ArticleNature2015

Transferred interbacterial antagonism genes augment eukaryotic innate immune function.

Seemay Chou, Matthew D Daugherty, S Brook Peterson, Jacob Biboy, Youyun Yang, Brandon L Jutras, Lillian K Fritz-Laylin, Michael A Ferrin, Brittany N Harding, Christine Jacobs-Wagner and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evolutionary innovation through fusion of sequences from across the tree of life.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Similarities betweenCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Bacterial origin of a key innovation in the evolution of the vertebrate eye.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Seemay ChouDepartment of Microbiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Matthew D Daugherty1] Division of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA [2] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA.
S Brook PetersonDepartment of Microbiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Jacob BiboyCentre for Bacterial Cell Biology, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK.
Youyun YangDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA.
Brandon L Jutras1] Microbial Sciences Institute, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06516, USA [2] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06516, USA.
Lillian K Fritz-LaylinDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94158, USA.
Michael A FerrinDepartment of Microbiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Brittany N HardingDepartment of Microbiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Christine Jacobs-Wagner1] Microbial Sciences Institute, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06516, USA [2] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06516, USA [3] Department of Microbial Pathogenesis, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06516, USA [4] Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06516, USA.
X Frank YangDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA.
Waldemar VollmerCentre for Bacterial Cell Biology, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK.
Harmit S Malik1] Division of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA [2] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA.
Joseph D MougousDepartment of Microbiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
University of Washington · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USNewcastle University · GBFred Hutch Cancer Center · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University School of MedicineUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Type VI secretion effectors and interbacterial competition in vivoR01AI080609 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MOUGOUS, JOSEPH DAVID · 2009 to 2025
$6.7M
Regulatory Network of the Lyme Disease PathogenR01AI083640 · NIAID · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI X. Frank Yang · 2009 to 2026
$5.9M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I020012/1Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIAID NIH HHS AI080609NIAID NIH HHS AI083640NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI080609NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI083640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Horizontal gene transfer allows organisms to rapidly acquire adaptive traits. Although documented instances of horizontal gene transfer from bacteria to eukaryotes remain rare, bacteria represent a rich source of new functions potentially available for co-option. One benefit that genes of bacterial origin could provide to eukaryotes is the capacity to produce antibacterials, which have evolved in prokaryotes as the result of eons of interbacterial competition. The type VI secretion amidase effector (Tae) proteins are potent bacteriocidal enzymes that degrade the cell wall when delivered into competing bacterial cells by the type VI secretion system. Here we show that tae genes have been transferred to eukaryotes on at least six occasions, and that the resulting domesticated amidase effector (dae) genes have been preserved for hundreds of millions of years through purifying selection. We show that the dae genes acquired eukaryotic secretion signals, are expressed within recipient organisms, and encode active antibacterial toxins that possess substrate specificity matching extant Tae proteins of the same lineage. Finally, we show that a dae gene in the deer tick Ixodes scapularis limits proliferation of Borrelia burgdorferi, the aetiologic agent of Lyme disease. Our work demonstrates that a family of horizontally acquired toxins honed to mediate interbacterial antagonism confers previously undescribed antibacterial capacity to eukaryotes. We speculate that the selective pressure imposed by competition between bacteria has produced a reservoir of genes encoding diverse antimicrobial functions that are tailored for co-option by eukaryotic innate immune systems.

Indexed as

Immunity, InnateAmidohydrolasesAnimalsBacteriaBacterial Secretion SystemsBacterial ToxinsBorrelia burgdorferiCell WallConserved SequenceEukaryotaGenes, BacterialGene Transfer, HorizontalIxodesPhylogenySubstrate SpecificityamidaseAmidohydrolasesBacterial Secretion SystemsBacterial Toxins

Identifiers

PMID25470067
PMCPMC4713192
OpenAlexW1985727657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.