ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2015
Prognostic significance of thymidylate synthase expression in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A meta-analysis.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic Value of c-MET Expression in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer Receiving Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prognostic significance of thymidylate synthase (TS) overexpression in pancreatic adenocarcinoma has been extensively investigated; however, data on the survival of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma remain equivocal. We performed a meta-analysis of previous studies to assess the effects of TS overexpression on the overall survival (OS) of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, using hazard ratio (HR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 5 studies, including 425 patients, were subjected to the final analysis. The pooled HR was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.41-1.25; Z=1.18, P=0.238), indicating that TS expression exerted no significant survival effect on patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The combined HR was 0.46 (95% CI: 0.31-0.68; Z=3.95, P<0.001), limiting the analysis to the studies assessing R0 resection patients, which indicated that a high expression of TS was significantly correlated with better OS in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent R0 resection. This meta-analysis identified TS as an independent factor predicting favourable outcome following R0 curative resection in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.