Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25468874›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2015

The Y-chromosome tree bursts into leaf: 13,000 high-confidence SNPs covering the majority of known clades.

Pille Hallast, Chiara Batini, Daniel Zadik, Pierpaolo Maisano Delser, Jon H Wetton, Eduardo Arroyo-Pardo, Gianpiero L Cavalleri, Peter de Knijff, Giovanni Destro Bisol, Berit Myhre Dupuy and 19 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Pille HallastDepartment of Genetics, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Chiara BatiniDepartment of Genetics, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Daniel ZadikDepartment of Genetics, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Pierpaolo Maisano DelserDepartment of Genetics, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Jon H WettonDepartment of Genetics, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Eduardo Arroyo-PardoLaboratory of Forensic and Population Genetics, Department of Toxicology and Health Legislation, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain.
Gianpiero L CavalleriMolecular and Cellular Therapeutics, The Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Peter de KnijffDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Giovanni Destro BisolIstituto Italiano di Antropologia, Rome, Italy Department of Environmental Biology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Berit Myhre DupuyDivision of Forensic Sciences, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Heidi A EriksenCentre of Arctic Medicine, Thule Institute, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland Utsjoki Health Care Centre, Utsjoki, Finland.
Lynn B JordeDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT.
Turi E KingDepartment of Genetics, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Maarten H LarmuseauLaboratory of Forensic Genetics and Molecular Archaeology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Department of Imaging & Pathology, Biomedical Forensic Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Laboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Genomics, Department of Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Adolfo López de MunainDepartment of Neurosciences, University of the Basque Country, San Sebastián, Spain.
Ana M López-ParraLaboratory of Forensic and Population Genetics, Department of Toxicology and Health Legislation, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain.
Aphrodite LoutradisNational Center for Thalassemias, Athens, Greece.
Jelena MilasinSchool of Dental Medicine, Institute of Human Genetics, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Andrea NovellettoDepartment of Biology, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
Horolma PamjavNetwork of Forensic Science Institutes, Institute of Forensic Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
Antti SajantilaDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Hjelt Institute, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Institute of Applied Genetics, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas.
Werner SchemppInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Matt SearsDepartment of Genetics, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Aslıhan TolunDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Chris Tyler-SmithWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Anneleen Van GeystelenLaboratory of Socioecology and Social Evolution, Department of Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Scott WatkinsDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT.
Bruce WinneyDepartment of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Mark A JoblingDepartment of Genetics, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom maj4@le.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 087576
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many studies of human populations have used the male-specific region of the Y chromosome (MSY) as a marker, but MSY sequence variants have traditionally been subject to ascertainment bias. Also, dating of haplogroups has relied on Y-specific short tandem repeats (STRs), involving problems of mutation rate choice, and possible long-term mutation saturation. Next-generation sequencing can ascertain single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in an unbiased way, leading to phylogenies in which branch-lengths are proportional to time, and allowing the times-to-most-recent-common-ancestor (TMRCAs) of nodes to be estimated directly. Here we describe the sequencing of 3.7 Mb of MSY in each of 448 human males at a mean coverage of 51×, yielding 13,261 high-confidence SNPs, 65.9% of which are previously unreported. The resulting phylogeny covers the majority of the known clades, provides date estimates of nodes, and constitutes a robust evolutionary framework for analyzing the history of other classes of mutation. Different clades within the tree show subtle but significant differences in branch lengths to the root. We also apply a set of 23 Y-STRs to the same samples, allowing SNP- and STR-based diversity and TMRCA estimates to be systematically compared. Ongoing purifying selection is suggested by our analysis of the phylogenetic distribution of nonsynonymous variants in 15 MSY single-copy genes.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, YEvolution, MolecularHapMap ProjectHumansMalePhylogenyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNApurifying selectionsingle nucleotide polymorphismstargeted resequencingY-chromosome phylogenyY-STRs

Identifiers

PMID25468874
PMCPMC4327154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.