Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25468827›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2015

Maternal diet but not gestational weight gain predicts central adiposity accretion in utero among pregnant adolescents.

C M Whisner, B E Young, E K Pressman, R A Queenan, E M Cooper, K O O'Brien

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A narrative review of highly processed food addiction across the lifespan.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. A Brief Survey of Dietary Beliefs and Behaviors of Pregnant Adolescents.Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

C M WhisnerDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
B E YoungPediatric Nutrition, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, USA.
E K PressmanThe University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY, USA.
R A QueenanThe University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY, USA.
E M CooperThe University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY, USA.
K O O'BrienDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
University of Rochester · USCornell University · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundModifiable risk factors during pregnancy, such as diet and weight gain, are associated with fetal birth weight but little is known about how these factors influence fetal fat acquisition in utero among pregnant adolescents.

objectiveTo determine whether maternal pre-pregnancy BMI (ppBMI), gestational weight gain (GWG) and dietary intake during pregnancy influence fetal fat accretion in utero.

methodsLongitudinal data were obtained from 121 pregnant adolescents enrolled in a study designed to identify determinants of maternal and fetal bone changes across gestation. Adolescents (ages 13-18 years) completed up to three study visits during early, mid- and late gestation. Maternal anthropometrics, 24 h dietary recalls and measures of fetal biometry were obtained at each visit. Fetal abdominal wall thickness (abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness, AbFat), a measure of fetal subcutaneous fat, was calculated by sonography at each visit. Statistical determinants of AbFat during late pregnancy were explored using simple and multiple regression.

resultsDuring late pregnancy (34.8±2.0 weeks; range 31.0-40.6 weeks of gestation), the median (inter-quartile range) fetal AbFat and GWG were 0.44 (0.39, 0.55) cm and 14.6 (9.5, 18.3) kg, respectively. After adjusting for infant birth weight, variables significantly associated with fetal AbFat included gestational age (P<0.0001, 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.01, 0.03), maternal race (P=0.029, 95% CI: -0.04, -0.002) and dietary intake of added sugar (P=0.025, 95% CI: 1.42e-6, 2.06e-5). Fetal AbFat had a significant positive quadratic relationship with total maternal dietary sugar intake such that both low and high extremes of sugar consumption were associated with significantly higher fetal AbFat. Birth weight was not significantly associated with maternal intake of added sugars.

conclusionExtreme sugar intakes among pregnant adolescents may lead to increased accumulation of fetal abdominal fat with little net effect on birth weight. This finding suggests that increased sugar consumption during pregnancy promotes shifts in fetal body composition.

Indexed as

Weight GainAdolescentBirth WeightBody CompositionDietary CarbohydratesDietary SucroseFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaObesity, AbdominalPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnant PeopleRisk FactorsDietary CarbohydratesDietary Sucrose

Identifiers

PMID25468827
OpenAlexW1980005458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.