Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25468805›Full record

SynthesisMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2014

rs833061 and rs699947 on promoter gene of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and associated lung cancer susceptibility and survival: a meta-analysis.

Junwei Tu, Saibin Wang, Jianping Zhao, Jingqian Zhu, Lin Sheng, Yijun Sheng, Huijun Chen, Jianghua Tian

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prognostic Value of VEGF in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated with Sorafenib: A Meta-Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Cells · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Association of VEGF Gene Polymorphisms with the Risk and Prognosis of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Junwei TuDepartment of Pneumology, Zhejiang University Jinhua Hospital, Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China (mainland).
Saibin WangDepartment of Pneumology, Zhejiang University Jinhua Hospital, Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China (mainland).
Jianping ZhaoDepartment of Pneumology, Zhejiang University Jinhua Hospital, Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China (mainland).
Jingqian ZhuDepartment of Pneumology, Zhejiang University Jinhua Hospital, Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China (mainland).
Lin ShengDepartment of Pneumology, Zhejiang University Jinhua Hospital, Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China (mainland).
Yijun ShengDepartment of Pneumology, Zhejiang University Jinhua Hospital, Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China (mainland).
Huijun ChenDepartment of Pneumology, Zhejiang University Jinhua Hospital, Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China (mainland).
Jianghua TianDepartment of Pneumology, Zhejiang University Jinhua Hospital, Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China (mainland).
Jinhua Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs 2 important SNPs located in the promoter region of VEGF gene, the roles of rs833061 (-460C>T) and rs699947 (-2578C>A) in lung cancer susceptibility and survival remain inconclusive and controversial. MATERIAL/

methodsFor better understanding of these 2 SNPs in lung cancer risk and survival, a meta-analysis was performed to pool findings of previous studies and to generate large-scale evidence.

resultsBased on the 10 eligible studies included, this study observed that the -460C>T polymorphism generally had no significant effect on lung cancer risk. However, subgroup analysis found that -460TT homozygote variant might confer significantly increased cancer risk for Asians (TT vs. CC: OR=1.69, 95% CI 1.08-2.63, p=0.02), but not in Caucasians. Similar results were observed in -2578C>A in Asians (AA vs. CC: OR=3.00, 95% CI 1.51-5.95, p=0.002; AA vs. AC: OR=3.15, 95% CI 1.00-9.91, p=0.05; AA vs. (AC+CC): OR=2.92, 95% CI 1.51-5.65, p=0.001). In lung cancer survival, 4 trials included had conflicting results. One found -460C>T polymorphism had no effect on survival, 1 observed risk increasing, while the remaining 2 observed risk decreasing. This inconsistency was closely related to the different therapeutic practices applied in different studies, the effects of which were significantly affected by VEGF expression.

conclusions-460TT and -2578AA homozygote might lead to significantly increased cancer risk for Asians, but the effects on survival remain to be explored. These 2 SNPs might be potential indicators of lung cancer risk for Asians and should be considered when planning chemotherapy and radiotherapy for lung cancer patients.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseCase-Control StudiesHumansLung NeoplasmsPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePromoter Regions, GeneticSurvival AnalysisVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25468805
PMCPMC4263404
OpenAlexW2120673382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.