Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25468710›Full record

ArticleMolecular oncology2015

Untangling the ATR-CHEK1 network for prognostication, prediction and therapeutic target validation in breast cancer.

Tarek M A Abdel-Fatah, Fiona K Middleton, Arvind Arora, Devika Agarwal, Tao Chen, Paul M Moseley, Christina Perry, Rachel Doherty, Stephen Chan, Andrew R Green and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Natural products targeting the ATR-CHK1 signaling pathway in cancer therapy.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2022
    Review
  17. Hydrogen Sulfide Biology and Its Role in Cancer.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  18. Prognostic Value of the Immunohistochemical Expression of RAD51 and BRCA2 in Gastric Adenocarcinoma.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tarek M A Abdel-FatahDepartment of Oncology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
Fiona K MiddletonNorthern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.
Arvind AroraAcademic Unit of Oncology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
Devika AgarwalSchool of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Campus, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK.
Tao ChenNorthern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.
Paul M MoseleyDepartment of Oncology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
Christina PerryAcademic Unit of Oncology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
Rachel DohertyAcademic Unit of Oncology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
Stephen ChanDepartment of Oncology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
Andrew R GreenDepartment of Pathology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
Emad RakhaDepartment of Pathology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
Graham BallSchool of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Campus, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK.
Ian O EllisDepartment of Pathology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
Nicola J CurtinNorthern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.
Srinivasan MadhusudanDepartment of Oncology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK; Academic Unit of Oncology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK. Electronic address: srinivasan.madhusudan@nottingham.ac.uk.
University of Nottingham · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBNewcastle University · GBNottingham Trent University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ATR-CHEK1 signalling is critical for genomic stability. ATR-CHEK1 signalling may be deregulated in breast cancer and have prognostic, predictive and therapeutic significance. We investigated ATR, CHEK1 and phosphorylated CHEK1 (Ser345) protein (pCHEK1) levels in 1712 breast cancers. ATR and CHEK1 mRNA expression was evaluated in 1950 breast cancers. Pre-clinically, biological consequences of ATR gene knock down or ATR inhibition by the small molecule inhibitor (VE-821) were investigated in MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lines and in non-tumorigenic breast epithelial cells (MCF10A). High ATR and high cytoplasmic pCHEK1 levels were significantly associated with higher tumour stage, higher mitotic index, pleomorphism and lymphovascular invasion. In univariate analyses, high ATR and high cytoplasmic pCHEK1 levels were associated with poor breast cancer specific survival (BCSS). In multivariate analysis, high ATR level remains an independent predictor of adverse outcome. At the mRNA level, high CHEK1 remains associated with aggressive phenotypes including lymph node positivity, high grade, Her-2 overexpression, triple negative, aggressive molecular phenotypes and adverse BCSS. Pre-clinically, CHEK1 phosphorylation at serine(345) following replication stress was impaired in ATR knock down and in VE-821 treated breast cancer cells. Doxycycline inducible knockdown of ATR suppressed growth, which was restored when ATR was re-expressed. Similarly, VE-821 treatment resulted in a dose dependent suppression of cancer cell growth and survival (MCF7 and MDA-MB-231) but was less toxic in non-tumorigenic breast epithelial cells (MCF10A). We provide evidence that ATR and CHEK1 are promising biomarkers and rational drug targets for personalized therapy in breast cancer.

Indexed as

Molecular Targeted TherapyAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCheckpoint Kinase 1Cohort StudiesFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHEK293 CellsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm InvasivenessPhenotypePhosphorylationAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATR protein, humanCheckpoint Kinase 1CHEK1 protein, humanPhosphoserineProtein KinasesRNA, MessengerATRBiomarkerBreast cancerCHEK1

Identifiers

PMID25468710
PMCPMC5528699
OpenAlexW2095595090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.