Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25468505›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2014

Validation of the automatic image analyser to assess retinal vessel calibre (ALTAIR): a prospective study protocol.

Luis Garcia-Ortiz, Manuel A Gómez-Marcos, Jose I Recio-Rodríguez, Jose A Maderuelo-Fernández, Pablo Chamoso-Santos, Sara Rodríguez-González, Juan F de Paz-Santana, Miguel A Merchan-Cifuentes, Juan M Corchado-Rodríguez, ALTAIR group

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02087605 (Validation of the Automatic Image Analyzer to Assess Retinal Vessel Caliber), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02087605 completednot on this map

Validation of the Automatic Image Analyzer to Assess Retinal Vessel Caliber (ALTAIR)

TypeobservationalSponsorFundacion para la Investigacion y Formacion en Ciencias de la SaludRan2014 to 2016Enrolled400ConditionsCardiovascular Risk Factor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Luis Garcia-OrtizPrimary Care Research Unit La Alamedilla, Castilla and León Health Service (SACYL), Network of Preventive Activities and Health Promotion in Primary Care (REDIAPP), Salamanca Institute for Biomedical Research (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Manuel A Gómez-MarcosPrimary Care Research Unit La Alamedilla, Castilla and León Health Service (SACYL), Network of Preventive Activities and Health Promotion in Primary Care (REDIAPP), Salamanca Institute for Biomedical Research (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Jose I Recio-RodríguezPrimary Care Research Unit La Alamedilla, Castilla and León Health Service (SACYL), Network of Preventive Activities and Health Promotion in Primary Care (REDIAPP), Salamanca Institute for Biomedical Research (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.
Jose A Maderuelo-FernándezPrimary Care Research Unit La Alamedilla, Castilla and León Health Service (SACYL), Network of Preventive Activities and Health Promotion in Primary Care (REDIAPP), Salamanca Institute for Biomedical Research (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.
Pablo Chamoso-SantosBISITE Research Group, Computers and Automation Department, University of Salamanca, Salamanca Institute for Biomedical Research (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.
Sara Rodríguez-GonzálezBISITE Research Group, Computers and Automation Department, University of Salamanca, Salamanca Institute for Biomedical Research (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.
Juan F de Paz-SantanaBISITE Research Group, Computers and Automation Department, University of Salamanca, Salamanca Institute for Biomedical Research (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.
Miguel A Merchan-CifuentesCastilla and León Neuroscience Institute, University of Salamanca, Salamanca Institute for Biomedical Research (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.
Juan M Corchado-RodríguezBISITE Research Group, Computers and Automation Department, University of Salamanca, Salamanca Institute for Biomedical Research (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.
ALTAIR group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe fundus examination is a non-invasive evaluation of the microcirculation of the retina. The aim of the present study is to develop and validate (reliability and validity) the ALTAIR software platform (Automatic image analyser to assess retinal vessel calibre) in order to analyse its utility in different clinical environments. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A cross-sectional study in the first phase and a prospective observational study in the second with 4 years of follow-up. The study will be performed in a primary care centre and will include 386 participants. The main measurements will include carotid intima-media thickness, pulse wave velocity by Sphygmocor, cardio-ankle vascular index through the VASERA VS-1500, cardiac evaluation by a digital ECG and renal injury by microalbuminuria and glomerular filtration. The retinal vascular evaluation will be performed using a TOPCON TRCNW200 non-mydriatic retinal camera to obtain digital images of the retina, and the developed software (ALTAIR) will be used to automatically calculate the calibre of the retinal vessels, the vascularised area and the branching pattern. For software validation, the intraobserver and interobserver reliability, the concurrent validity of the vascular structure and function, as well as the association between the estimated retinal parameters and the evolution or onset of new lesions in the target organs or cardiovascular diseases will be examined. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the clinical research ethics committee of the healthcare area of Salamanca. All study participants will sign an informed consent to agree to participate in the study in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the WHO standards for observational studies. Validation of this tool will provide greater reliability to the analysis of retinal vessels by decreasing the intervention of the observer and will result in increased validity through the use of additional information, especially in the areas of vascularisation and vessel branching patterns. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT02087605.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBlood Flow VelocityCardiovascular DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesEquipment DesignFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsRetinal VesselsPRIMARY CAREVASCULAR MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID25468505
PMCPMC4256642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.