ArticleAmerican journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation2015
Influence of kidney function on risk of supratherapeutic international normalized ratio-related hemorrhage in warfarin users: a prospective cohort study.
Article in American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thromboembolic and Hemorrhagic Outcomes in the Direct Oral Anticoagulant Trials Across the Spectrum of Kidney Function.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2021Trial
- Predictors of bleeding-related in-hospital complications after coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: A single-center retrospective cohort study in Iran.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Article
- Are the Direct Oral Anticoagulants Better Than Warfarin for the Prevention and Treatment of Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation?Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2026Review
- Exploring the Interactions between Drugs and Metabolic Disturbances in CKD: An Example with Oral Anticoagulants.Kidney360 · 2025Article
- Anticoagulation in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease: A Critical Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- Anticoagulation in Chronic Kidney Disease.Drugs · 2024Review
- Anticoagulation in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.American journal of nephrology · 2024Review
- Acute kidney injury interacts with VKORC1 genotype on initiative warfarin dose among heart surgery recipients: a real-world research.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Oral anticoagulants, time in therapeutic range and renal function over time in real-life patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease.Open heart · 2022Article
- Genome-wide polygenic score to predict chronic kidney disease across ancestries.Nature medicine · 2022Article
- Risk of overanticoagulation during acute kidney injury in patients treated with vitamin K antagonists.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2022Article
- Best quality indicator of vitamin K antagonist therapy to predict mortality and bleeding in haemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2021Article
- Consequences of oral antithrombotic use in patients with chronic kidney disease.Clinical and translational science · 2021Article
- Risk Factors for Major Hemorrhage Among Patients Receiving Dabigatran Across the Spectrum of CKD Not Requiring Dialysis Therapy.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2021Article
- Evaluation of Anticoagulation Control among Patients Taking Warfarin in University of Gondar Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.Advances in hematology · 2021Article
- Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation in CKD: Role of Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants. A Narrative Review.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
- Atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease conundrum: an update.Journal of nephrology · 2019Review
- Anticoagulation in chronic kidney disease: from guidelines to clinical practice.Clinical cardiology · 2019Review
- Risks of anticoagulation in patients with chronic kidney disease and atrial fibrillation: More than just bleeding?Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnticoagulation management is difficult in chronic kidney disease, with frequent supratherapeutic international normalized ratios (INRs ≥ 4) increasing hemorrhagic risk. We evaluated whether the interaction of INR and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) increases hemorrhage risk and whether patients with lower eGFRs experience slower anticoagulation reversal. STUDY
designProspective cohort study. SETTING &
participantsWarfarin pharmacogenetics cohort (1,273 long-term warfarin users); warfarin reversal cohort (74 warfarin users admitted with INRs ≥ 4). PREDICTOR: eGFR, INR as time-dependent covariate, and their interaction in the pharmacogenetics cohort; eGFR in the reversal cohort. OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: In the pharmacogenetics cohort, hemorrhagic (serious, life-threatening, and fatal bleeding) risk was assessed using proportional hazards regression. In the reversal cohort, anticoagulation reversal was assessed from changes in INR, warfarin and metabolite concentrations, clotting factors (II, VII, IX, and X), and PIVKA-II (protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist II) levels at presentation and after reversal, using linear regression and path analysis.
resultsIn the pharmacogenetics cohort, 454 (35.7%) had eGFRs < 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). There were 137 hemorrhages in 119 patients over 1,802 person-years of follow-up (incidence rate, 7.6 [95% CI, 6.4-8.9]/100 person-years). Patients with lower eGFRs had a higher frequency of INR ≥ 4 (P<0.001). Risk of hemorrhage was affected significantly by eGFR-INR interaction. At INR<4, there was no difference in hemorrhage risk by eGFR (all P ≥ 0.4). At INR≥4, patients with eGFRs of 30 to 44 and < 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) had 2.2-fold (95% CI, 0.8-6.1; P=0.1) and 5.8-fold (95% CI, 2.9-11.4; P<0.001) higher hemorrhage risks, respectively, versus those with eGFRs ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). In the reversal cohort, 35 (47%) had eGFRs < 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Patients with eGFRs < 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) experienced slower anticoagulation reversal as assessed by INR (P=0.04) and PIVKA-II level (P=0.008) than those with eGFRs ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2). LIMITATIONS: Limited sample size in the reversal cohort, unavailability of antibiotic use and urine albumin data.
conclusionsPatients with lower eGFRs have differentially higher hemorrhage risk at INR ≥ 4. Moreover, because the INR reversal rate is slower, hemorrhage risk is prolonged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.