Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25468336›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2014

A refined reaction-diffusion model of tau-microtubule dynamics and its application in FDAP analysis.

Maxim Igaev, Dennis Janning, Frederik Sündermann, Benedikt Niewidok, Roland Brandt, Wolfgang Junge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Insights into Disease-Associated Tau Impact on Mitochondria.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Physical Biology of Axonal Damage.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maxim IgaevDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany. Electronic address: maxim.igaev@biologie.uni-osnabrueck.de.
Dennis JanningDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
Frederik SündermannDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
Benedikt NiewidokDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
Roland BrandtDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
Wolfgang JungeDepartment of Biophysics, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence decay after photoactivation (FDAP) and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) are well established approaches for studying the interaction of the microtubule (MT)-associated protein tau with MTs in neuronal cells. Previous interpretations of FDAP/FRAP data have revealed dwell times of tau on MTs in the range of several seconds. However, this is difficult to reconcile with a dwell time recently measured by single-molecule analysis in neuronal processes that was shorter by two orders of magnitude. Questioning the validity of previously used phenomenological interpretations of FDAP/FRAP data, we have generalized the standard two-state reaction-diffusion equations by 1), accounting for the parallel and discrete arrangement of MTs in cell processes (i.e., homogeneous versus heterogeneous distribution of tau-binding sites); and 2), explicitly considering both active (diffusion upon MTs) and passive (piggybacking upon MTs at rates of slow axonal transport) motion of bound tau. For some idealized cases, analytical solutions were derived. By comparing them with the full numerical solution and Monte Carlo simulations, the respective validity domains were mapped. Interpretation of our FDAP data (from processes of neuronally differentiated PC12 cells) in light of the heterogeneous formalism yielded independent estimates for the association (∼2 ms) and dwell (∼100 ms) times of tau to/on a single MT rather than in an MT array. The dwell time was shorter by orders of magnitude than that in a previous report where a homogeneous topology of MTs was assumed. We found that the diffusion of bound tau was negligible in vivo, in contrast to an earlier report that tau diffuses along the MT lattice in vitro. Methodologically, our results demonstrate that the heterogeneity of binding sites cannot be ignored when dealing with reaction-diffusion of cytoskeleton-associated proteins. Physiologically, the results reveal the behavior of tau in cellular processes, which is noticeably different from that in vitro.

Indexed as

Fluorescence Recovery After PhotobleachingModels, BiologicalAnimalsBinding SitesComputer SimulationDiffusionGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHumansMicrotubulesMonte Carlo MethodPC12 CellsRatstau ProteinsGreen Fluorescent Proteinstau Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25468336
PMCPMC4255205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.