Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25468329›Full record

ReviewBiophysical journal2014

The value of mechanistic biophysical information for systems-level understanding of complex biological processes such as cytokinesis.

Thomas D Pollard

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Roles of Septins in Regulating Fission Yeast Cytokinesis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Rho Family GTPases in Fission Yeast Cytokinesis.Communicative & integrative biology · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Fission yeast myosin Myo2 is down-regulated in actin affinity by light chain phosphorylation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas D PollardDepartments of Molecular Cellular and Developmental Biology, Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, and Cell Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: thomas.pollard@yale.edu.
Yale University · US

Funding

MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF CELLULAR MOTILITYR01GM026338 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI POLLARD, THOMAS D. · 1985 to 2020
$9.8M
Mechanism of cytokinesis in fission yeastR01GM026132 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI POLLARD, THOMAS D. · 1985 to 2021
$8.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM026132NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM026132NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM026338NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM026338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review illustrates the value of quantitative information including concentrations, kinetic constants and equilibrium constants in modeling and simulating complex biological processes. Although much has been learned about some biological systems without these parameter values, they greatly strengthen mechanistic accounts of dynamical systems. The analysis of muscle contraction is a classic example of the value of combining an inventory of the molecules, atomic structures of the molecules, kinetic constants for the reactions, reconstitutions with purified proteins and theoretical modeling to account for the contraction of whole muscles. A similar strategy is now being used to understand the mechanism of cytokinesis using fission yeast as a favorable model system.

Indexed as

Biophysical PhenomenaCytokinesisSystems BiologyAnimalsEukaryotaHumansModels, BiologicalMuscle Contraction

Identifiers

PMID25468329
PMCPMC4255220
OpenAlexW1999066601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.