Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25467785›Full record

ReviewBreast cancer research : BCR2014

Risk determination and prevention of breast cancer.

Anthony Howell, Annie S Anderson, Robert B Clarke, Stephen W Duffy, D Gareth Evans, Montserat Garcia-Closas, Andy J Gescher, Timothy J Key, John M Saxton, Michelle N Harvie

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04855552 (Pilot Telehealth Weight Loss Program for Breast Cancer Survivors), which is not on this map. Cited by 151 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
151citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04855552 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Telehealth Weight Loss Program for Breast Cancer Survivors

TypeinterventionalSponsorAbramson Cancer Center at Penn MedicineRan2021 to 2027Enrolled22ConditionsCancer Survivors, Cancer of Breast, Body Weight, Overweight and ObesityArmsBehavioral Weight-loss Program Via Telehealth, Behavioral Weight-Loss Program Via Telehealth - Weight Measures, Validated Surveys of Patient-Reported Outcomes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

151 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 333 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Plasma metabolomics profiles and breast cancer risk.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2024
    Article

91 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Anthony Howell
Annie S Anderson
Robert B Clarke
Stephen W Duffy
D Gareth Evans
Montserat Garcia-Closas
Andy J Gescher
Timothy J Key
John M Saxton
Michelle N Harvie
Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GBNinewells Hospital · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Leicester · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBWythenshawe Hospital · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16491Chief Scientist Office CZH/4/745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is an increasing public health problem. Substantial advances have been made in the treatment of breast cancer, but the introduction of methods to predict women at elevated risk and prevent the disease has been less successful. Here, we summarize recent data on newer approaches to risk prediction, available approaches to prevention, how new approaches may be made, and the difficult problem of using what we already know to prevent breast cancer in populations. During 2012, the Breast Cancer Campaign facilitated a series of workshops, each covering a specialty area of breast cancer to identify gaps in our knowledge. The risk-and-prevention panel involved in this exercise was asked to expand and update its report and review recent relevant peer-reviewed literature. The enlarged position paper presented here highlights the key gaps in risk-and-prevention research that were identified, together with recommendations for action. The panel estimated from the relevant literature that potentially 50% of breast cancer could be prevented in the subgroup of women at high and moderate risk of breast cancer by using current chemoprevention (tamoxifen, raloxifene, exemestane, and anastrozole) and that, in all women, lifestyle measures, including weight control, exercise, and moderating alcohol intake, could reduce breast cancer risk by about 30%. Risk may be estimated by standard models potentially with the addition of, for example, mammographic density and appropriate single-nucleotide polymorphisms. This review expands on four areas: (a) the prediction of breast cancer risk, (b) the evidence for the effectiveness of preventive therapy and lifestyle approaches to prevention, (c) how understanding the biology of the breast may lead to new targets for prevention, and (d) a summary of published guidelines for preventive approaches and measures required for their implementation. We hope that efforts to fill these and other gaps will lead to considerable advances in our efforts to predict risk and prevent breast cancer over the next 10 years.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGuidelines as TopicHumansPediatric ObesityRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSedentary Behavior

Identifiers

PMID25467785
PMCPMC4303126
OpenAlexW2126275835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.