ArticleLancet (London, England)2015
Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995-2009: analysis of individual data for 25,676,887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2).
Article in Lancet (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1,185 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Evaluation of Breast Cancer at Brazilian Institutions - Project AMAZONA III
Polymeric Nanoparticles Loaded With Cetuximab and Decorated With Somatostatin Analogue for Targeting of Colon Cancer
Camrelizumab Combined With Apatinib Mesylate for Perioperative Treatment of Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma:a Randomized, Open-label, Parallel, Multicenter Trial
Who cites it
1,185 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review of factors associated with the patient and diagnostic intervals in gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026Pooled it
- ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline Express Update on the adoption of physical exercise in patients with localised colon cancer.ESMO open · 2026Guideline
- Compression sleeves for prevention and treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of node-RADS for the detection of lymph node invasion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2025Pooled it
- Quality of Nursing Care: Addressing Sexuality as Part of Prostate Cancer Management, an Umbrella Review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Pooled it
- Prevalence of Breast Cancer Screening in Asia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Pooled it
- MRI-derived extracellular volume as a biomarker of cancer therapy cardiotoxicity: systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2024Pooled it
- Reproductive factors, hormonal interventions, and gastric cancer risk in the Stomach cancer Pooling (StoP) Project.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2024Pooled it
- Observed and relative survival trends of lung cancer: A systematic review of population-based cancer registration data.Thoracic cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Novel Prevention Approaches of Breast Cancer Surgery Related Complications: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Pooled it
- Quality of life with palbociclib plus tamoxifen in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: results from PATHWAY, an Asian international, double-blind, randomized phase 3 trial.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Trial
- Lipid metabolism associated with efficacy of metronomic capecitabine and camrelizumab in gastrointestinal cancer: an exploratory clinical trial.BMC medicine · 2025Trial
- The anti-PD-L1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody KN046 plus lenvatinib in advanced unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase II trial.Nature communications · 2025Trial
- Efficacy and safety of the combination of envafolimab and lenvatinib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-arm, multicentre, exploratory phase II clinical study.Investigational new drugs · 2025Trial
- Adjuvant Lenvatinib for High-Risk CNLC IIb/IIIa Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Curative Hepatectomy: A Prospective Exploratory Study.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Patterns of health-promoting lifestyles among patients with colorectal cancer: A latent profile analysis.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- Global breast cancer survival estimates in 2017-2021 to advance the WHO Global Breast Cancer Initiative.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Construction of a Neoantigen Prognostic Model for Gastric Adenocarcinoma Based on Multi-Omics Data Mining and the Design of mRNA Vaccines and Targeted Drugs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Rationale and Methods of a Surveillance System for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Hematological Malignancies: A Qualitative Participatory Action Research Approach in Middle-Income Countries-The Experience in Iran.Health science reports · 2026Article
1,125 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWorldwide data for cancer survival are scarce. We aimed to initiate worldwide surveillance of cancer survival by central analysis of population-based registry data, as a metric of the effectiveness of health systems, and to inform global policy on cancer control.
methodsIndividual tumour records were submitted by 279 population-based cancer registries in 67 countries for 25·7 million adults (age 15-99 years) and 75,000 children (age 0-14 years) diagnosed with cancer during 1995-2009 and followed up to Dec 31, 2009, or later. We looked at cancers of the stomach, colon, rectum, liver, lung, breast (women), cervix, ovary, and prostate in adults, and adult and childhood leukaemia. Standardised quality control procedures were applied; errors were corrected by the registry concerned. We estimated 5-year net survival, adjusted for background mortality in every country or region by age (single year), sex, and calendar year, and by race or ethnic origin in some countries. Estimates were age-standardised with the International Cancer Survival Standard weights.
findings5-year survival from colon, rectal, and breast cancers has increased steadily in most developed countries. For patients diagnosed during 2005-09, survival for colon and rectal cancer reached 60% or more in 22 countries around the world; for breast cancer, 5-year survival rose to 85% or higher in 17 countries worldwide. Liver and lung cancer remain lethal in all nations: for both cancers, 5-year survival is below 20% everywhere in Europe, in the range 15-19% in North America, and as low as 7-9% in Mongolia and Thailand. Striking rises in 5-year survival from prostate cancer have occurred in many countries: survival rose by 10-20% between 1995-99 and 2005-09 in 22 countries in South America, Asia, and Europe, but survival still varies widely around the world, from less than 60% in Bulgaria and Thailand to 95% or more in Brazil, Puerto Rico, and the USA. For cervical cancer, national estimates of 5-year survival range from less than 50% to more than 70%; regional variations are much wider, and improvements between 1995-99 and 2005-09 have generally been slight. For women diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2005-09, 5-year survival was 40% or higher only in Ecuador, the USA, and 17 countries in Asia and Europe. 5-year survival for stomach cancer in 2005-09 was high (54-58%) in Japan and South Korea, compared with less than 40% in other countries. By contrast, 5-year survival from adult leukaemia in Japan and South Korea (18-23%) is lower than in most other countries. 5-year survival from childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia is less than 60% in several countries, but as high as 90% in Canada and four European countries, which suggests major deficiencies in the management of a largely curable disease.
interpretationInternational comparison of survival trends reveals very wide differences that are likely to be attributable to differences in access to early diagnosis and optimum treatment. Continuous worldwide surveillance of cancer survival should become an indispensable source of information for cancer patients and researchers and a stimulus for politicians to improve health policy and health-care systems.
fundingCanadian Partnership Against Cancer (Toronto, Canada), Cancer Focus Northern Ireland (Belfast, UK), Cancer Institute New South Wales (Sydney, Australia), Cancer Research UK (London, UK), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, GA, USA), Swiss Re (London, UK), Swiss Cancer Research foundation (Bern, Switzerland), Swiss Cancer League (Bern, Switzerland), and University of Kentucky (Lexington, KY, USA).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.