ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2015
A method of detecting contamination events using multiple conventional water quality sensors.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in machine learning and IoT for water quality monitoring: A comprehensive review.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Review of Modeling Methodologies for Managing Water Distribution Security.Journal of water resources planning and management · 2020Article
- Integrating fuzzy logic with Pearson correlation to optimize contaminant detection in water distribution system with uncertainty analyses.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2019Article
- Detection of contaminants in water supply: A review on state-of-the-art monitoring technologies and their applications.Sensors and actuators. B, Chemical · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early warning systems are often used for detecting contamination accidents. Traditional event detection methods suffer from high false negative and false positive errors. This paper proposes a detection method using multiple conventional water quality sensors and introduces a method to determine the values of parameters, which was configured as a multiple optimization problem and solved using a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II). The capability of the proposed method to detect contamination events caused by cadmium nitrate is demonstrated in this paper. The performance of the proposed method to detect events caused by different concentrations was also investigated. Results show that, after calibration, the proposed method can detect a contamination event 1 min after addition of cadmium nitrate at the concentration of 0.008 mg/l and has low false negative and positive rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25467418What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.