ArticleClinical oral investigations2015
Quantitative evaluation of toothbrush and arm-joint motion during tooth brushing.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Subject-specific stability of toothbrushing performance: insights from dynamic time warping and phenotype analysis.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Trial
- Effect of Mozart's music on the learning of toothbrushing behavior in children with high and low dental anxiety levels.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Trial
- Prevention of non-cavitated lesions with fluoride and xylitol varnishes during orthodontic treatment: a randomized clinical trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2021Trial
- Randomised controlled trial on differential learning of toothbrushing in 6- to 9-year-old children.Clinical oral investigations · 2018Trial
- UMATBrush: A dataset of inertial signals of toothbrushing activities.Data in brief · 2025Article
- Optimizing oral hygiene for children and adolescents with Down syndrome: a scoping review.Canadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD · 2025Article
- Salivary alpha-amylase activity and its association with early childhood caries and rampant caries experience: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- The Influence of Coordinative Skills on the Oral Health of Children and Adolescents in Permanent Dentition.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Effects of the Dental Caries Preventive Procedure on the White Spot Lesions during Orthodontic Treatment-An Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Using big data to promote precision oral health in the context of a learning healthcare system.Journal of public health dentistry · 2020Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIt is very difficult for dental professionals to objectively assess tooth brushing skill of patients, because an obvious index to assess the brushing motion of patients has not been established. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate toothbrush and arm-joint motion during tooth brushing. MATERIALS AND
methodsTooth brushing motion, performed by dental hygienists for 15 s, was captured using a motion-capture system that continuously calculates the three-dimensional coordinates of object's motion relative to the floor. The dental hygienists performed the tooth brushing on the buccal and palatal sides of their right and left upper molars. The frequencies and power spectra of toothbrush motion and joint angles of the shoulder, elbow, and wrist were calculated and analyzed statistically.
resultsThe frequency of toothbrush motion was higher on the left side (both buccal and palatal areas) than on the right side. There were no significant differences among joint angle frequencies within each brushing area. The inter- and intra-individual variations of the power spectrum of the elbow flexion angle when brushing were smaller than for any of the other angles.
conclusionsThis study quantitatively confirmed that dental hygienists have individual distinctive rhythms during tooth brushing. All arm joints moved synchronously during brushing, and tooth brushing motion was controlled by coordinated movement of the joints. The elbow generated an individual's frequency through a stabilizing movement. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The shoulder and wrist control the hand motion, and the elbow generates the cyclic rhythm during tooth brushing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.