Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25467017›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2015

A randomized phase II study of the telomerase inhibitor imetelstat as maintenance therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

A A Chiappori, T Kolevska, D R Spigel, S Hager, M Rarick, S Gadgeel, N Blais, J Von Pawel, L Hart, M Reck and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 177 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. How telomere attrition protects against cancer.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.

A A ChiapporiThoracic Oncology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa alberto.chiappori@moffitt.org.
T KolevskaDepartment of Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Vallejo.
D R SpigelResearch Consortium, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville.
S HagerThoracic Department, Cancer Care Associates of Fresno Medical Group, Fresno.
M RarickOncology Hematology Department, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland.
S GadgeelKarmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, USA.
N BlaisCHUM-Hopital Notre-Dame, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Von PawelDepartment of Oncology, Asklepios Fachkliniken Muenchen-Gauting, Gauting, Bayern, Germany.
L HartSarah Cannon Florida Cancer Specialists, Bonita Springs, USA.
M ReckDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany.
E BassettDepartment of Biostatistics, Geron Corporation, Menlo Park.
B BuringtonDepartment of Biostatistics, Geron Corporation, Menlo Park.
J H SchillerDepartment of Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
Geron (United States) · USAsklepios Fachkliniken München-Gauting · DEGerman Center for Lung Research · DEHôpital Notre-Dame · CAKaiser Permanente · USKaiser Permanente Vallejo Medical Center · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USSarah Cannon · USSarah Cannon Research Institute · GBThe Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KENNETH Lynn WRIGHT · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS--SPORE IN LUNG CANCERP50CA070907 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI GIBBONS, DON LYNN · 1996 to 2024
$57.4M
UT Southwestern Medical Center Simmons Comprehensive Cancer CenterP30CA142543 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Sandi Leigh Pruitt · 2010 to 2026
$53.7M
Integrative Molecular Epidemiology WorkshopR25CA174664 · NCI · AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH · PI Shelley S Tworoger · 2013 to 2026
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292NCI NIH HHS P30 CA142543NCI NIH HHS P30 CA142543-04NCI NIH HHS P50 CA070907NCI NIH HHS P50 CA70907NCI NIH HHS R25 CA174664
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContinuation or 'switch' maintenance therapy is commonly used in patients with advancd non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we evaluated the efficacy of the telomerase inhibitor, imetelstat, as switch maintenance therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe primary end point of this open-label, randomized phase II study was progression-free survival (PFS). Patients with non-progressive, advanced NSCLC after platinum-based doublet (first-line) chemotherapy (with or without bevacizumab), any histology, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 were eligible. Randomization was 2 : 1 in favor of imetelstat, administered at 9.4 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle, or observation. Telomere length (TL) biomarker exploratory analysis was carried out in tumor tissue by quantitative PCR (qPCR) and telomerase fluorescence in situ hybridization.

resultsOf 116 patients enrolled, 114 were evaluable. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were more frequent with imetelstat. Median PFS was 2.8 and 2.6 months for imetelstat-treated versus control [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.844; 95% CI 0.54-1.31; P = 0.446]. Median survival time favored imetelstat (14.3 versus 11.5 months), although not significantly (HR = 0.68; 95% CI 0.41-1.12; P = 0.129). Exploratory analysis demonstrated a trend toward longer median PFS (HR = 0.43; 95% CI 0.14-1.3; P = 0.124) and overall survival (OS; HR = 0.41; 95% CI 0.11-1.46; P = 0.155) in imetelstat-treated patients with short TL, but no improvement in median PFS and OS in patients with long TL (HR = 0.86; 95% CI 0.39-1.88; and HR = 0.51; 95% CI 0.2-1.28; P = 0.145).

conclusionsMaintenance imetelstat failed to improve PFS in advanced NSCLC patients responding to first-line therapy. There was a trend toward a improvement in median PFS and OS in patients with short TL. Short TL as a predictive biomarker will require further investigation for the clinical development of imetelstat.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDisease-Free SurvivalEnzyme InhibitorsFemaleHumansIndolesIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaplan-Meier EstimateLung NeoplasmsMaintenance ChemotherapyMaleMiddle AgedAntineoplastic AgentsEnzyme InhibitorsimetelstatIndolesNiacinamideOligonucleotidesTelomerasebiomarkerimetelstatnon-small-cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID25467017
PMCPMC4304381
OpenAlexW2146200359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.