Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25466818›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genomics2014

FLAGS, frequently mutated genes in public exomes.

Casper Shyr, Maja Tarailo-Graovac, Michael Gottlieb, Jessica J Y Lee, Clara van Karnebeek, Wyeth W Wasserman

Erratum issuedAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 108 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Exome sequencing points to pathogenic ATM variants in gastric cancer.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Tumor-Informed ctDNA Assay to Predict Outcome in Recurrent and/or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Treated with PD-1 Inhibitor.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Casper ShyrCentre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, Child and Family Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada. casper@cmmt.ubc.ca.
Maja Tarailo-GraovacCentre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, Child and Family Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada. maja@cmmt.ubc.ca.
Michael GottliebCentre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, Child and Family Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada. mike.m.gottlieb@gmail.com.
Jessica J Y LeeCentre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, Child and Family Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada. leejae7@interchange.ubc.ca.
Clara van KarnebeekTreatable Intellectual Disability Endeavour in British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. cvankarnebeek@cw.bc.ca.
Wyeth W WassermanCentre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, Child and Family Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada. wyeth@cmmt.ubc.ca.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research 301221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDramatic improvements in DNA-sequencing technologies and computational analyses have led to wide use of whole exome sequencing (WES) to identify the genetic basis of Mendelian disorders. More than 180 novel rare-disease-causing genes with Mendelian inheritance patterns have been discovered through sequencing the exomes of just a few unrelated individuals or family members. As rare/novel genetic variants continue to be uncovered, there is a major challenge in distinguishing true pathogenic variants from rare benign mutations.

methodsWe used publicly available exome cohorts, together with the dbSNP database, to derive a list of genes (n = 100) that most frequently exhibit rare (<1%) non-synonymous/splice-site variants in general populations. We termed these genes FLAGS for FrequentLy mutAted GeneS and analyzed their properties.

resultsAnalysis of FLAGS revealed that these genes have significantly longer protein coding sequences, a greater number of paralogs and display less evolutionarily selective pressure than expected. FLAGS are more frequently reported in PubMed clinical literature and more frequently associated with diseased phenotypes compared to the set of human protein-coding genes. We demonstrated an overlap between FLAGS and the rare-disease causing genes recently discovered through WES studies (n = 10) and the need for replication studies and rigorous statistical and biological analyses when associating FLAGS to rare disease. Finally, we showed how FLAGS are applied in disease-causing variant prioritization approach on exome data from a family affected by an unknown rare genetic disorder.

conclusionsWe showed that some genes are frequently affected by rare, likely functional variants in general population, and are frequently observed in WES studies analyzing diverse rare phenotypes. We found that the rate at which genes accumulate rare mutations is beneficial information for prioritizing candidates. We provided a ranking system based on the mutation accumulation rates for prioritizing exome-captured human genes, and propose that clinical reports associating any disease/phenotype to FLAGS be evaluated with extra caution.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualGene Expression ProfilingGene FrequencyBiomarkersChild, PreschoolDatasets as TopicExomeFemaleHumansMutationOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisSequence Analysis, RNABiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID25466818
PMCPMC4267152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.