ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2014
Reduced circulating endothelial progenitor cells in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome.
Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome With Ischemic Stroke Underlying Ring Finger Protein 213 Vasculopathy.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Article
- Systemic Arterial Stiffness in Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome: A Prospective Case-Control Study.European journal of neurology · 2026Observational
- Short-term effects of air pollution and weather on reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: a retrospective bicenter study.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Treatment-Related Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome Patients with a History of Migraine: A Retrospective Case-control Study.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2023Article
- Pathophysiology of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome.Journal of biomedical science · 2022Review
- Post-reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome headache.The journal of headache and pain · 2021Article
- Vascular wall imaging in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome - a 3-T contrast-enhanced MRI study.The journal of headache and pain · 2018Article
- Cerebral endothelial dysfunction in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: a case-control study.The journal of headache and pain · 2017Article
- Gender and hormonal influences in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome.European stroke journal · 2016Article
- Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome and Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome Presenting with Deep Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Young Women.Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe pathophysiology of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) remains elusive. Endothelial dysfunction might play a role, but direct evidence is lacking. This study aimed to explore whether patients with RCVS have a reduced level of circulating circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) to repair the dysfunctional endothelial vasomotor control.
methodsWe prospectively recruited 24 patients with RCVS within one month of disease onset and 24 healthy age- and sex-matched controls. Flow cytometry was used to quantify the numbers of circulating EPCs, defined as KDR+CD133+, CD34+CD133+, and CD34+KDR+ double-positive mononuclear cells. The Lindegaard index, an index of vasoconstriction, was calculated by measuring the mean flow velocity of middle cerebral arteries and distal extracranial internal carotid arteries via color-coded sonography on the same day as blood drawing. A Lindegaard index of 2 was chosen as the cutoff value for significant vasoconstriction of middle cerebral arteries based on our previous study.
resultsPatients with RCVS had a reduced number of CD34+KDR+ cells (0.009 ± 0.006% vs. 0.014 ± 0.010%, p = 0.031) but not KDR+CD133+ cells or CD34+CD133+ EPCs, in comparison with controls. The number of CD34+KDR+ cells was inversely correlated with the Lindegaard index (rs = -0.418, p = 0.047). Of note, compared to controls, patients with a Lindegaard index > 2 (n = 13) had a reduced number of CD34+KDR+ cells (0.007 ± 0.005% vs. 0.014 ± 0.010%, p = 0.010), but those with a Lindegaard index ≤ 2 did not.
conclusionsPatients with RCVS had reduced circulating CD34+KDR+ EPCs, which were correlated with the severity of vasoconstriction. Endothelial dysfunction might contribute to the pathogenesis of RCVS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.