Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25466685›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2015

At the crossroads: Hazard assessment and reduction of health risks from arsenic in private well waters of the northeastern United States and Atlantic Canada.

Yan Zheng, Joseph D Ayotte

Open access · greenAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Environmental pollution and kidney diseases.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2018
    Review
  16. Evaluating Geologic Sources of Arsenic in Well Water in Virginia (USA).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yan ZhengCity University of New York, School of Public Health and Queens College, City University of New York, 65-30 Kissena Blvd., Flushing, NY 11367, United States of America; Columbia University, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, 61 Route 9, Palisades, NY 10964, United States of America. Electronic address: yan.zheng@qc.cuny.edu.
Joseph D AyotteU.S. Geological Survey, 331 Commerce Way, Pembroke, NH 03301, United States of America. Electronic address: jayotte@usgs.gov.
Queens College, CUNY · USUnited States Geological Survey · US

Funding

Training CoreP42ES010349 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI NAVAS-ACIEN, ANA · 2000 to 2020
$53.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS 3P42 ES10349NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES010349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This special issue contains 12 papers that report on new understanding of arsenic (As) hydrogeochemistry, performance of household well water treatment systems, and testing and treatment behaviors of well users in several states of the northeastern region of the United States and Nova Scotia, Canada. The responsibility to ensure water safety of private wells falls on well owners. In the U.S., 43 million Americans, mostly from rural areas, use private wells. In order to reduce As exposure in rural populations that rely on private wells for drinking water, risk assessment, which includes estimation of population at risk of exposure to As above the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level, is helpful but insufficient because it does not identify individual households at risk. Persistent optimistic bias among well owners against testing and barriers such as cost of treatment mean that a large percentage of the population will not act to reduce their exposure to harmful substances such as As. If households are in areas with known As occurrence, a potentially large percentage of well owners will remain unaware of their exposure. To ensure that everyone, including vulnerable populations such as low income families with children and pregnant women, is not exposed to arsenic in their drinking water, alternative action will be required and warrants further research.

Indexed as

ArsenicDrinking WaterEnvironmental ExposureHumansNew EnglandNova ScotiaRisk AssessmentWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater WellsArsenicDrinking WaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalArsenicBehaviorExposure reductionGeochemistryHydrogeologyPrivate well water

Identifiers

PMID25466685
PMCPMC4386837
OpenAlexW1983575190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.