Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25466624›Full record

ArticleMemorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz2014

Diagnostic reliability of an immunochromatographic test for Chagas disease screening at a primary health care centre in a rural endemic area.

Diego Mendicino, Mariana Stafuza, Carlina Colussi, Mónica del Barco, Mirtha Streiger, Edgardo Moretti

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Diego MendicinoCentre for Research on National Endemics, Faculty of Biochemistry and Biological Sciences, National University of Litoral, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Mariana StafuzaCentre for Research on National Endemics, Faculty of Biochemistry and Biological Sciences, National University of Litoral, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Carlina ColussiCentre for Research on National Endemics, Faculty of Biochemistry and Biological Sciences, National University of Litoral, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Mónica del BarcoCentre for Research on National Endemics, Faculty of Biochemistry and Biological Sciences, National University of Litoral, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Mirtha StreigerCentre for Research on National Endemics, Faculty of Biochemistry and Biological Sciences, National University of Litoral, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Edgardo MorettiNational Coordination for Vector Control, Faculty of Medical Sciences, National University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Argentina.
National University of the Littoral · ARUniversidad Nacional de Córdoba · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many patients with Chagas disease live in remote communities that lack both equipment and trained personnel to perform a diagnosis by conventional serology (CS). Thus, reliable tests suitable for use under difficult conditions are required. In this study, we evaluated the ability of personnel with and without laboratory skills to perform immunochromatographic (IC) tests to detect Chagas disease at a primary health care centre (PHCC). We examined whole blood samples from 241 patients and serum samples from 238 patients. Then, we calculated the percentage of overall agreement (POA) between the two groups of operators for the sensitivity (S), specificity (Sp) and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of IC tests compared to CS tests. We also evaluated the level of agreement between ELISAs and indirect haemagglutination (IHA) tests. The readings of the IC test results showed 100% agreement (POA = 1). The IC test on whole blood showed the following values: S = 87.3%; Sp = 98.8%; PPV = 96.9% and NPV = 95.9%. Additionally, the IC test on serum displayed the following results: S = 95.7%; Sp = 100%; PPV = 100% and NPV = 98.2%. Using whole blood, the agreement with ELISA was 96.3% and the agreement with IHA was 94.1%. Using serum, the agreement with ELISA was 97.8% and the agreement with IHA was 96.6%. The IC test performance with serum samples was excellent and demonstrated its usefulness in a PHCC with minimal equipment. If the IC test S value and NPV with whole blood are improved, then this test could also be used in areas lacking laboratories or specialised personnel.

Indexed as

Chromatography, AffinityChromatography, Thin LayerEndemic DiseasesArgentinaChagas DiseaseEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHemagglutination TestsHumansLaboratory PersonnelPredictive Value of TestsPrimary Health CareReproducibility of ResultsRural Health ServicesRural Population

Identifiers

PMID25466624
PMCPMC4325615
OpenAlexW2030881269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.