ReviewSolid state nuclear magnetic resonance2015
Solid-state NMR studies of proteins immobilized on inorganic surfaces.
Review in Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Elucidation of the aragonite nanofiber formation mechanism of LICP contained in the hinge ligament ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Controls of nature: Secondary, tertiary, and quaternary structure of the enamel protein amelogenin in solution and on hydroxyapatite.Journal of structural biology · 2020Review
- Osteopontin regulates biomimetic calcium phosphate crystallization from disordered mineral layers covering apatite crystallites.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Studies of Dynamic Binding of Amino Acids to TiOLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2020Article
- Controlling protein assembly on inorganic crystals through designed protein interfaces.Nature · 2019Article
- Bone mineral: new insights into its chemical composition.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Solid-State NMR and MD Study of the Structure of the Statherin Mutant SNa15 on Mineral Surfaces.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2019Article
- Solid-State NMR Identification of Intermolecular Interactions in Amelogenin Bound to Hydroxyapatite.Biophysical journal · 2018Article
- Secondary structure and dynamics study of the intrinsically disordered silica-mineralizing peptide PProteins · 2017Article
- Dynamic interactions of amelogenin with hydroxyapatite surfaces are dependent on protein phosphorylation and solution pH.Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Solid state NMR is the primary tool for studying the quantitative, site-specific structure, orientation, and dynamics of biomineralization proteins under biologically relevant conditions. Two calcium phosphate proteins, statherin (43 amino acids) and leucine rich amelogenin protein (LRAP; 59 amino acids), have been studied in depth and have different dynamic properties and 2D- and 3D-structural features. These differences make it difficult to extract design principles used in nature for building materials with properties such as high strength, unusual morphologies, or uncommon phases. Consequently, design principles needed for developing synthetic materials controlled by proteins are not clear. Many biomineralization proteins are much larger than statherin and LRAP, necessitating the study of larger biomineralization proteins. More recent studies of the significantly larger full-length amelogenin (180 residues) represent a significant step forward to ultimately investigate the full diversity of biomineralization proteins. Interactions of amino acids, a silaffin derived peptide, and the model LK peptide with silica are also being studied, along with qualitative studies of the organic matrices interacting with calcium carbonate. Dipolar recoupling techniques have formed the core of the quantitative studies, yet the need for isolated spin pairs makes this approach costly and time intensive. The use of multi-dimensional techniques to study biomineralization proteins is becoming more common, methodology which, despite its challenges with these difficult-to-study proteins, will continue to drive future advancements in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.