Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25466309›Full record

ReviewTrends in immunology2014

Force and affinity in ligand discrimination by the TCR.

David Depoil, Michael L Dustin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Interaction of integrin αFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Physical extraction of antigen and information.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Immune cells use active tugging forces to distinguish affinity and accelerate evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Mechanoregulation of PDZ Proteins, An Emerging Function.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  10. Relationship of 2D Affinity to T Cell Functional Outcomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

David DepoilThe Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, Nuffield Department of Orthopedics and Musculosceletal Sciences, The University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Headington, OX3 7FY, United Kingdom; Helene and Martin Kimmel Center for Biology and Medicine of the Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, Department of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, 540 First Avenue, New York, NY 10012, USA.
Michael L DustinThe Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, Nuffield Department of Orthopedics and Musculosceletal Sciences, The University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Headington, OX3 7FY, United Kingdom; Helene and Martin Kimmel Center for Biology and Medicine of the Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, Department of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, 540 First Avenue, New York, NY 10012, USA. Electronic address: michael.dustin@kennedy.ox.ac.uk.
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

Requirement for Sensitive T Cell Response to AntigenR37AI043542 · NIAID · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI DUSTIN, MICHAEL LORAN · 2007 to 2016
$3.6M
REQUIREMENT FOR SENSITIVE T CELL RESPONSE TO ANTIGENR01AI043542 · NIAID · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI DUSTIN, MICHAEL L · 1999 to 2005
$1.5M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI043542NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI043542Wellcome Trust 100262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T cell recognition of antigen is a physical process that requires formation of a cell-cell junction that is rich in active force generation. Recently a biomolecular force probe was used to examine how the T cell receptor (TCR)-pMHC interaction responds to force and the consequences of force-dependent interactions for T cell activation. While adhesion and costimulatory molecules in the immunological synapse impact upon the overall force of the interaction, these results suggest that the TCR uses a force-dependent bond - a catch bond - and that it may therefore be important to consider the TCR-pMHC interaction in isolation in the early phases of the decision process. We discuss here these findings in the context of other work on the impact of forces on the TCR and the quantification of interaction in interfaces.

Identifiers

PMID25466309
PMCPMC5617748
OpenAlexW1977672603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.