ArticleGeneral hospital psychiatry
Collaborative care for a patient with bipolar disorder in primary care: a case example.
Article in General hospital psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of Collaborative Care and Colocated Specialty Care for Bipolar Disorder in Primary Care: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison PsychiatryTrial
- Collaborative care treatment for major depressive disorder.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Bipolar Disorder in Primary Care: Integrated Care Experiences.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe objective was to describe the process of care and treatment outcomes of a 36-year-old man with bipolar disorder treated using a collaborative care model in primary care.
methodsWe reviewed and summarized relevant clinical data describing the patient's care including the medical record, consultant's reports and discussions with treating clinicians. A meeting was held with experienced consulting psychiatrists to discuss the case.
resultsSeveral barriers to delivery of high-quality care existed including initial loss to follow-up, few social supports and lack of follow-through at the community mental health center existed, along with presence of factors that negatively influence bipolar disorder outcomes including initial unopposed antidepressant use at baseline, concurrent alcohol use and co-occurring anxiety symptoms. Despite these barriers, the collaborative care team was able to engage the patient in care and achieve the patient's and team's treatment goals.
conclusionDelivery of primary-care-based collaborative care was associated with reduction of bipolar disorder symptoms and improved functioning in a patient with bipolar disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.