Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25465246›Full record

ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2014

[Treatment of myofascial lumbar dorsal pain. Effective clinical diagnostics and therapy].

R Levene, O Günther, H-J Rothkötter, N Bitterlich, J Buchmann

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

R LeveneUniversitätsmedizin Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Deutschland.
O Günther
H-J Rothkötter
N Bitterlich
J Buchmann
Klinikum Magdeburg · DEUniversitätsmedizin Rostock · DEUniversity Hospital Magdeburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backroundLumbar dorsal pain is a problem that must be taken seriously and is part of many people's everyday lives. Not only does it cause high costs for the health system, it also frequently leads to inability to work. The significance of the myofascial system is still not taken seriously enough in therapy and clinical diagnostics, when treating dorsal pain. In the following article, the effectiveness of specifically targeted therapy for myofascial pain is evaluated.

methodsIncluded in the study were 44 patients referred for lumbar dorsal treatment-resistant pain to a practice specializing in pain therapy. Therapy focused on treatment of the affected muscle area with physiotherapy and the additional techniques of infiltrating trigger points, neural therapy, and general relaxation exercises. Medication was optimized according to the specific guidelines for the condition. The effect of therapy was evaluated using the German pain questionnaire (Deutsche Schmerzfragebogen).

resultsAfter the therapy phase, patients had a significantly lower intensity of pain, anxiety, and depression, as well as an increased quality of life.

conclusionThe results indicate that targeted treatment of muscles and fascia in patients with chronic back pain can lead to a reduction of pain symptoms. The consideration of the myofascial systems, particularly in relation to nonspecific back pain, could contribute to improving the treatment of pain and contribute to lowering costs.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnxiety DisordersCombined Modality TherapyDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedMyofascial Pain SyndromesPain ManagementPain MeasurementQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID25465246
OpenAlexW2174735280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.