Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25465111›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2015

The durability of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: 18 year follow-up of the UK cohort of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT).

Andrew J Molyneux, Jacqueline Birks, Alison Clarke, Mary Sneade, Richard S C Kerr

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 264 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
264citing papers in PubMed, 16 pooled it
31.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03115905 completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

A Registry Study for Emergency Medical Service of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage With Different Economic Development Levels Areas in China

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorXuanwu Hospital, BeijingRan2017 to 2021Enrolled6,000ConditionsSubarachnoid Hemorrhage, Aneurysmal, Emergency Medical Services
NCT04507178 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Improving Outcome in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage wIth Nadroparine

TypeinterventionalSponsorAcademisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)Ran2022 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsAneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Delayed Cerebral IschemiaArmsNadroparin Injectable Product
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

264 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 650 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Single-stage endovascular treatment in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage with multiple intracranial aneurysms: Systematic review of the literature and multicentric retrospective experience.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Comparison of Stent-Assisted and Non-Stent-Assisted coil embolization in the treatment of Wide-Neck intracranial aneurysms: A Meta-Analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Review

204 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew J MolyneuxOxford Neurovascular and Neuroradiology Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: andy.molyneux@nds.ox.ac.uk.
Jacqueline BirksCentre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford, UK.
Alison ClarkeOxford Neurovascular and Neuroradiology Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Mary SneadeOxford Neurovascular and Neuroradiology Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Richard S C KerrDepartment of Neurosurgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
University of Oxford · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0700479Medical Research Council G9401611
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious analyses of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) cohort have reported on the risks of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage and death or dependency for a minimum of 5 years and up to a maximum of 14 years after treatment of a ruptured intracranial aneurysm with either neurosurgical clipping or endovascular coiling. At 1 year there was a 7% absolute and a 24% relative risk reduction of death and dependency in the coiling group compared with the clipping group, but the medium-term results showed the increased need for re-treatment of the target aneurysm in the patients given coiling. We report the long-term follow-up of patients in this UK cohort.

methodsIn ISAT, patients were randomly allocated to either neurosurgical clipping or endovascular coiling after a subarachnoid haemorrhage, assuming treatment equipoise, between Sept 12, 1994, and May 1, 2002. We followed up 1644 patients in 22 UK neurosurgical centres for death and clinical outcomes for 10·0-18·5 years. We assessed dependency as self-reported modified Rankin scale score obtained through yearly questionnaires. Data for recurrent aneurysms and rebleeding events were collected from questionnaires and from hospital and general practitioner records. The Office for National Statistics supplied data on deaths. This study is registered, number ISRCTN49866681.

findingsAt 10 years, 674 (83%) of 809 patients allocated endovascular coiling and 657 (79%) of 835 patients allocated neurosurgical clipping were alive (odds ratio [OR] 1·35, 95% CI 1·06-1·73). Of 1003 individuals who returned a questionnaire at 10 years, 435 (82%) patients treated with endovascular coiling and 370 (78%) patients treated with neurosurgical clipping were independent (modified Rankin scale score 0-2; OR 1·25; 95% CI 0·92-1·71). Patients in the endovascular treatment group were more likely to be alive and independent at 10 years than were patients in the neurosurgery group (OR 1·34, 95% CI 1·07-1·67). 33 patients had a recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage more than 1 year after their initial haemorrhage (17 from the target aneurysm).

interpretationAlthough rates of increased dependency alone did not differ between groups, the probability of death or dependency was significantly greater in the neurosurgical group than in the endovascular group. Rebleeding was more likely after endovascular coiling than after neurosurgical clipping, but the risk was small and the probability of disability-free survival was significantly greater in the endovascular group than in the neurosurgical group at 10 years.

fundingUK Medical Research Council.

Indexed as

Aneurysm, RupturedDisease-Free SurvivalEmbolization, TherapeuticFemaleHumansIntracranial AneurysmMaleNeurosurgical ProceduresSubarachnoid HemorrhageSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID25465111
PMCPMC4356153
OpenAlexW2166435247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.