Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25465053›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2014

Validity of a questionnaire measuring the world health organization concept of health system responsiveness with respect to perinatal services in the Dutch obstetric care system.

Jacoba van der Kooy, Nicole B Valentine, Erwin Birnie, Marijana Vujkovic, Johanna P de Graaf, Semiha Denktaş, Eric A P Steegers, Gouke J Bonsel

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jacoba van der KooyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Obstetrics & Prenatal Medicine, Room Hs-408, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, The Netherlands. j.vanderkooy@erasmusmc.nl.
Nicole B ValentineWorld Health Organization, Social Determinants of Health - Public Health, Environmental and Social Determinants of Health, Family, Women's and Children's Health, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland. valentinen@who.int.
Erwin BirnieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Obstetrics & Prenatal Medicine, Room Hs-408, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, The Netherlands. birnie@bmg.eur.nl.
Marijana VujkovicDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Obstetrics & Prenatal Medicine, Room Hs-408, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, The Netherlands. marijana.vujkovic@gmail.nl.
Johanna P de GraafDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Obstetrics & Prenatal Medicine, Room Hs-408, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, The Netherlands. j.degraaf@erasmusmc.nl.
Semiha DenktaşDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Obstetrics & Prenatal Medicine, Room Hs-408, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, The Netherlands. s.denktas@erasmusmc.nl.
Eric A P SteegersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Obstetrics & Prenatal Medicine, Room Hs-408, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, The Netherlands. e.a.p.steegers@erasmusmc.nl.
Gouke J BonselDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Obstetrics & Prenatal Medicine, Room Hs-408, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, The Netherlands. g.bonsel@erasmusmc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe concept of responsiveness, introduced by the World Health Organization (WHO), addresses non-clinical aspects of health service quality that are relevant regardless of provider, country, health system or health condition. Responsiveness refers to "aspects related to the way individuals are treated and the environment in which they are treated" during health system interactions. This paper assesses the psychometric properties of a newly developed responsiveness questionnaire dedicated to evaluating maternal experiences of perinatal care services, called the Responsiveness in Perinatal and Obstetric Health Care Questionnaire (ReproQ), using the eight-domain WHO concept.

methodsThe ReproQ was developed between October 2009 and February 2010 by adapting the WHO Responsiveness Questionnaire items to the perinatal care context. The psychometric properties of feasibility, construct validity, and discriminative validity were empirically assessed in a sample of Dutch women two weeks post partum.

resultsA total of 171 women consented to participation. Feasibility: the interviews lasted between 20 and 40 minutes and the overall missing rate was 8%. Construct validity: mean Cronbach's alphas for the antenatal, birth and postpartum phase were: 0.73 (range 0.57-0.82), 0.84 (range 0.66-0.92), and 0.87 (range 0.62-0.95) respectively. The item-own scale correlations within all phases were considerably higher than most of the item-other scale correlations. Within the antenatal care, birth care and post partum phases, the eight factors explained 69%, 69%, and 76% of variance respectively. Discriminative validity: overall responsiveness mean sum scores were higher for women whose children were not admitted. This confirmed the hypothesis that dissatisfaction with health outcomes is transferred to their judgement on responsiveness of the perinatal services.

conclusionsThe ReproQ interview-based questionnaire demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties to describe the quality of perinatal care in the Netherlands, with the potential to discriminate between different levels of quality of care. In view of the relatively small sample, further testing and research is recommended.

Indexed as

Perinatal CareWorld Health OrganizationAdultEthnicityFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicNetherlandsObstetricsParturitionPregnancyPsychometricsQuality of Health CareReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25465053
PMCPMC4265356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.