Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25464024›Full record

ArticleAppetite2015

Food reinforcement and delay discounting in zBMI-discordant siblings.

Denise M Feda, James N Roemmich, April Roberts, Leonard H Epstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Appetite, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Unhealthy diets, obesity and time discounting: a systematic literature review and network analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Reinforcer pathology: Narrative of hurricane-associated loss increases delay discounting, demand, and consumption of highly palatable snacks in the obese.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2020
    Article
  9. An ecological momentary episodic future thinking intervention on mother's weekly food purchases.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2020
    Article
  10. A Reinforcer Pathology perspective on relapse.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2020
    Article
  11. Eating Responses to External Food Cues in Weight Discordant Siblings.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Denise M FedaDepartment of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14221, United States. Electronic address: denise.feda@waldenu.edu.
James N RoemmichUSDA-ARS-NPA Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center, Grand Forks, ND, United States.
April RobertsDepartment of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14221, United States.
Leonard H EpsteinDepartment of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14221, United States.

Funding

Non-shared environments and discordance of obesity in adolescent siblingsR01HD064958 · NICHD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI EPSTEIN, LEONARD H · 2010 to 2013
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD064958NICHD NIH HHS R01HD64958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe interaction of food reinforcement and the inability to delay gratification are related to adult energy intake and obesity. This study was designed to test the association of sibling pair differences in relative reinforcing efficacy of food and delay discounting on sibling pair differences in zBMI scores of same-gender zBMI-discordant siblings. DESIGN AND

methodsWe tested main and interactive relationships between delay discounting and relative reinforcing efficacy of food on zBMI discordance in 14 zBMI-discordant biological sibling pairs (6 female pairs) using a discordant sibling study design.

resultsSibling pair differences in relative reinforcing efficacy of food were associated with sibling pair differences in zBMI (p= 0.046); this effect was moderated by delay discounting (p <0.002). Sibling pairs with greater differences in relative reinforcing efficacy and delay discounting had greater differences in zBMI.

conclusionsThe combination of greater sibling pair differences in delay discounting and relative reinforcing efficacy is associated with greater discordance in zBMI in adolescent sibling pairs.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexDelay DiscountingReinforcement, PsychologySiblingsAdolescentChoice BehaviorEatingEnergy IntakeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLinear ModelsMaleObesityDelay discountingOverweightRelative reinforcing efficacySibling

Identifiers

PMID25464024
PMCPMC4283458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.