SynthesisHealth & place2015
A review of the current geographic distribution of and debate surrounding electronic cigarette clean air regulations in the United States.
Synthesis in Health & place, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Overview of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review.American journal of preventive medicine · 2017Pooled it
- Comprehensive vaping bans are associated with lower odds of initiation into electronic nicotine delivery systems use among young people.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2024Article
- Patterns, clusters, and transitions in U.S. state ENDS policy implementation: 2010-2020.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Tobacco Policy and ENDS Policy Influences on Adolescent Vaping Across the U.S. States.American journal of preventive medicine · 2023Article
- Association between e-cigarette use behaviors and perceived harmfulness of e-cigarettes and anxiety/depression symptoms among Black/African American Adults.Preventive medicine reports · 2023Article
- Vaping in a Time of Pandemics: Risk Perception and Motivations for Electronic Cigarette Use.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023Article
- It's Just Steam: a qualitative analysis of New Zealand ENDS users' perceptions of secondhand aerosol.Tobacco control · 2021Article
- PhenX: Environment measures for Tobacco Regulatory Research.Tobacco control · 2020Article
- Does E-cigarette Use at Baseline Influence Smoking Cessation Rates among 2-Year College Students?Journal of smoking cessation · 2018Article
- Initiation of Traditional Cigarette Smoking after Electronic Cigarette Use Among Tobacco-Naïve US Young Adults.The American journal of medicine · 2018Article
- Arguments for amending smoke-free legislation in U.S. states to restrict use of electronic nicotine delivery systems.Preventive medicine reports · 2018Article
- Use of electronic cigarettes in smoke-free environments.Tobacco control · 2017Article
- Should electronic cigarette use be covered by clean indoor air laws?Tobacco control · 2017Article
- E-cigarette Policymaking by Local and State Governments: 2009-2014.The Milbank quarterly · 2016Article
- Perceived Harm of Secondhand Electronic Cigarette Vapors and Policy Support to Restrict Public Vaping: Results From a National Survey of US Adults.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2016Article
- Country-level correlates of e-cigarette use in the European Union.International journal of public health · 2016Article
- E-cigarette use in adults: a qualitative study of users' perceptions and future use intentions.Addiction research & theory · 2016Article
- To Regulate or Not to Regulate? Views on Electronic Cigarette Regulations and Beliefs about the Reasons for and against Regulation.PloS one · 2016Article
- Electronic Cigarettes on Hospital Campuses.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015Article
- Progression to Traditional Cigarette Smoking After Electronic Cigarette Use Among US Adolescents and Young Adults.JAMA pediatrics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this article, we present the results of a systematic review of state, county, and municipal restrictions on the use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) in public spaces within the United States, alongside an overview of the current legal landscape. The lack of federal guidance leaves lower-level jurisdictions to debate the merits of restrictions on use in public spaces without sufficient scientific research. As we show through a geographic assessment of restrictions, this has resulted in an inconsistent patchwork of e-cigarette use bans across the United States of varying degrees of coverage. Bans have emerged over time in a manner that suggests a "bottom up" diffusion of e-cigarette clean air policies. Ultimately, the lack of clinical and scientific knowledge on the risks and potential harm reduction benefits has led to precautionary policymaking, which often lacks grounding in empirical evidence and results in spatially uneven diffusion of policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.