Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25463497›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2015

A mild process to design silk scaffolds with reduced β-sheet structure and various topographies at the nanometer scale.

Yazhen Pei, Xi Liu, Shanshan Liu, Qiang Lu, Jing Liu, David L Kaplan, Hesun Zhu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Silk fibroin scaffolds with inverse opal structure for bone tissue engineering.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Silk Biomaterials with Vascularization Capacity.Advanced functional materials · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yazhen PeiNational Engineering Laboratory for Modern Silk & Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China.
Xi LiuNational Engineering Laboratory for Modern Silk & Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China.
Shanshan LiuNational Engineering Laboratory for Modern Silk & Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China.
Qiang LuNational Engineering Laboratory for Modern Silk & Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: Lvqiang78@suda.edu.cn.
Jing LiuRegenerative Medicine Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, No. 222 Zhongshan Road, Dalian 116011, People's Republic of China.
David L KaplanNational Engineering Laboratory for Modern Silk & Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
Hesun ZhuResearch Center of Materials Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, People's Republic of China.
Soochow University · CNBeijing Institute of Technology · CNDalian Medical University · CN

Funding

Silica-protein Nanocomposites for Dental RepairR01DE017207 · NIDCR · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI KAPLAN, DAVID L. · 2007 to 2016
$3.0M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE017207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3-D) porous silk scaffolds with good biocompatibility and minimal immunogenicity show promise in a range of tissue regeneration applications. However, the challenge remains to effectively fabricate their microstructures and mechanical properties to satisfy the specific requirements of different tissues. In this study, silk scaffolds were fabricated to form an extracellular matrix (ECM) mimetic nanofibrous architecture using a mild process. A slowly increasing concentration process was applied to regulate silk self-assembly into nanofibers in aqueous solution. Then glycerol was blended with the nanofiber solution and induced silk crystallization in the lyophilization process, endowing freeze-dried scaffolds with water stability. The glycerol was leached from the scaffolds, leaving a similar porous structure at the micrometer scale but different topographies at the nanoscale. Compared to previous salt-leached and methanol-annealed scaffolds, the present scaffolds showed lower β-sheet content, softer mechanical property and improved cell growth and differentiation behaviors, suggesting their promising future as platforms for controlling stem cell fate and soft tissue regeneration.

Indexed as

Materials TestingAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCells, CulturedMesenchymal Stem CellsPorosityProtein Structure, SecondaryRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySilkTissue ScaffoldsSilkECM-mimicReduced β-sheet structureSilkSoft tissue

Identifiers

PMID25463497
PMCPMC4293369
OpenAlexW2063596198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.