Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25462628›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2015

Secondary ion mass spectrometry and Raman spectroscopy for tissue engineering applications.

Yelena Ilin, Mary L Kraft

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Noninvasive andThe Analyst · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Stem Cell Spheroids and Ex Vivo Niche Modeling: Rationalization and Scaling-Up.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yelena IlinDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.
Mary L KraftDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA; Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA; Center for Biophysics and Quantitative Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA. Electronic address: mlkraft@illinois.edu.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Training Program in Chemistry-Interface with BiologyT32GM070421 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI HERGENROTHER, PAUL · 2005 to 2019
$5.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM070421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying the matrix properties that permit directing stem cell fate is crucial for expanding desired cell lineages ex vivo for disease treatment. Such efforts require knowledge of matrix surface chemistry and the cell responses they elicit. Recent progress in analyzing biomaterial composition and identifying cell phenotype with two label-free chemical imaging techniques, TOF-SIMS and Raman spectroscopy are presented. TOF-SIMS is becoming indispensable for the surface characterization of biomaterial scaffolds. Developments in TOF-SIMS data analysis enable correlating surface chemistry with biological response. Advances in the interpretation of Raman spectra permit identifying the fate decisions of individual, living cells with location specificity. Here we highlight this progress and discuss further improvements that would facilitate efforts to develop artificial scaffolds for tissue regeneration.

Indexed as

Tissue EngineeringAnimalsHumansProteinsSpectrometry, Mass, Secondary IonSpectrum Analysis, RamanSubstrate SpecificityProteins

Identifiers

PMID25462628
PMCPMC4297681
OpenAlexW2035907817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.