Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25462530›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids2014

COSMID: A Web-based Tool for Identifying and Validating CRISPR/Cas Off-target Sites.

Thomas J Cradick, Peng Qiu, Ciaran M Lee, Eli J Fine, Gang Bao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 253 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
253citing papers in PubMed
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

253 citing papers in PubMed, 419 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

193 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas J CradickDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Peng QiuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Ciaran M LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Eli J FineDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Gang BaoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Georgia Institute of Technology · USEmory University · US

Funding

Nanomedicine Center for Nucleoprotein MachinesPN2EY018244 · NEI · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI BAO, GANG · 2006 to 2015
$24.4M
NEI NIH HHS PN2 EY018244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precise genome editing using engineered nucleases can significantly facilitate biological studies and disease treatment. In particular, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) with CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins are a potentially powerful tool for modifying a genome by targeted cleavage of DNA sequences complementary to designed guide strand RNAs. Although CRISPR/Cas systems can have on-target cleavage rates close to the transfection rates, they may also have relatively high off-target cleavage at similar genomic sites that contain one or more base pair mismatches, and insertions or deletions relative to the guide strand. We have developed a bioinformatics-based tool, COSMID (CRISPR Off-target Sites with Mismatches, Insertions, and Deletions) that searches genomes for potential off-target sites (http://crispr.bme.gatech.edu). Based on the user-supplied guide strand and input parameters, COSMID identifies potential off-target sites with the specified number of mismatched bases and insertions or deletions when compared with the guide strand. For each site, amplification primers optimal for the chosen application are also given as output. This ranked-list of potential off-target sites assists the choice and evaluation of intended target sites, thus helping the design of CRISPR/Cas systems with minimal off-target effects, as well as the identification and quantification of CRISPR/Cas induced off-target cleavage in cells.

Identifiers

PMID25462530
PMCPMC4272406
OpenAlexW2091140839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.