Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25462293›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in pharmacology2015

Recent insights into the mode of action of memantine and ketamine.

Jon W Johnson, Nathan G Glasgow, Nadezhda V Povysheva

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Hemiplegic migraine: genetics and pathophysiology.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Advancing past ketamine: emerging glutamatergic compounds for the treatment of depression.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The Astrocytic Zinc Transporter ZIP12 Is a Synaptic Protein That Contributes to Synaptic Zinc Levels in the Mouse Auditory Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Mechanisms of NMDA Receptor Inhibition by Biguanide Compounds.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jon W JohnsonDepartment of Neuroscience and Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. Electronic address: jjohnson@pitt.edu.
Nathan G GlasgowDepartment of Neuroscience and Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Nadezhda V PovyshevaDepartment of Neuroscience and Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Permeation, Block, and Gating of NMDA ReceptorsR01MH045817 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JOHNSON, JON W. · 1997 to 2017
$5.0M
Training in Mechanisms and Clinical Presentation of PainT32NS073548 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Jami Lynn Saloman, BRADLEY K. TAYLOR · 2012 to 2026
$3.1M
NMDA Receptor Subtype Selective Modualtors as Alzheimer's Disease TherapeuticsR41AG048723 · NIA · NEUROP, INC. · PI JOHNSON, JON W., MYERS, SCOTT JAMES · 2014 to 2014
$219k
NMDA Receptor Subtype-Dependent Mechanisms of Action of Memantine and KetamineF31MH105056 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI GLASGOW, NATHAN G · 2014 to 2015
$82k
NIA NIH HHS R41 AG048723NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH105056NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH045817NIMH NIH HHS R01MH045817NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS073548NINDS NIH HHS T32NS073548
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical benefits of the glutamate receptor antagonists memantine and ketamine have helped sustain optimism that glutamate receptors represent viable targets for development of therapeutic drugs. Both memantine and ketamine antagonize N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs), a glutamate receptor subfamily, by blocking the receptor-associated ion channel. Although many of the basic characteristics of NMDAR inhibition by memantine and ketamine appear similar, their effects on humans and to a lesser extent on rodents are strongly divergent. Some recent research suggests that preferential inhibition by memantine and ketamine of distinct NMDAR subpopulations may contribute to the drugs' differential clinical effects. Here we review studies that shed light on possible explanations for differences between the effects of memantine and ketamine.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrug DesignExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsHumansKetamineMemantineMolecular Targeted TherapyReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsKetamineMemantineReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID25462293
PMCPMC4318755
OpenAlexW2009020263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.