Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25461246›Full record

ArticlePharmacogenetics and genomics2015

Poor warfarin dose prediction with pharmacogenetic algorithms that exclude genotypes important for African Americans.

Katarzyna Drozda, Shan Wong, Shitalben R Patel, Adam P Bress, Edith A Nutescu, Rick A Kittles, Larisa H Cavallari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacogenetics and genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The frequency of majorPharmacogenomics · 2023
    Article
  12. Cardiovascular precision medicine - A pharmacogenomic perspective.Cambridge prisms. Precision medicine · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. How to Implement a Pharmacogenetics Service at your Institution.Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP · 2022
    Article
  15. Warfarin Dosing in Patients With CYP2C9*5 Variant Alleles.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. PharmVar GeneFocus: CYP2C9.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katarzyna DrozdaDepartments of aPharmacy Practice bPharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy cCenter for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomic Research dDepartment of Medicine, Section of Hematology and Oncology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois eDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, University of Florida at Gainesville, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Shan Wong
Shitalben R Patel
Adam P Bress
Edith A Nutescu
Rick A Kittles
Larisa H Cavallari

Funding

Patient-Centered Anticoagulation Self-Monitoring in Minority Patients.K23HL112908 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI NUTESCU, EDITH · 2013 to 2016
$524k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL112908NHLBI NIH HHS K23HL112908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesRecent clinical trial data cast doubt on the utility of genotype-guided warfarin dosing, specifically showing worse dosing with a pharmacogenetic versus clinical dosing algorithm in African Americans. However, many genotypes important in African Americans were not accounted for. We aimed to determine whether omission of the CYP2C9*5, CYP2C9*6, CYP2C9*8, CYP2C9*11 alleles and rs12777823 G > A genotype affects performance of dosing algorithms in African Americans.

methodsIn a cohort of 274 warfarin-treated African Americans, we examined the association between the CYP2C9*5, CYP2C9*6, CYP2C9*8, CYP2C9*11 alleles and rs12777823 G > A genotype and warfarin dose prediction error with pharmacogenetic algorithms used in clinical trials.

resultsThe http://www.warfarindosing.org algorithm overestimated doses by a median (interquartile range) of 1.2 (0.02-2.6) mg/day in rs12777823 heterozygotes (P<0.001 for predicted vs. observed dose), 2.0 (0.6-2.8) mg/day in rs12777823 variant homozygotes (P = 0.004), and 2.2 (0.5-2.9) mg/day in carriers of a CYP2C9 variant (P < 0.001). The International Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium (IWPC) algorithm underdosed warfarin by 0.8 (-2.3 to 0.4) mg/day for patients with the rs12777823 GG genotype (P < 0.001) and overdosed warfarin by 0.7 (-0.4 to 1.9) mg/day in carriers of a variant CYP2C9 allele (P = 0.04). Modifying the http://www.warfarindosing.org algorithm to adjust for variants important in African Americans led to better dose prediction than either the original http://www.warfarindosing.org (P < 0.01) or IWPC (P < 0.01) algorithm.

conclusionThese data suggest that, when providing genotype-guided warfarin dosing, failure to account for variants important in African Americans leads to significant dosing error in this population.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDrug Dosage CalculationsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAdultAgedAnticoagulantsBlack or African AmericanCytochrome P-450 CYP2C9Dose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleGenotypeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPharmacogeneticsPrognosisAnticoagulantsCYP2C9 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP2C9Warfarin

Identifiers

PMID25461246
PMCPMC4280295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.