Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25460860›Full record

Trial reportHeart rhythm2015

The effect of reverse remodeling on long-term survival in mildly symptomatic patients with heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy: results of the REVERSE study.

Michael R Gold, Claude Daubert, William T Abraham, Stefano Ghio, Martin St John Sutton, John Harrison Hudnall, Jeffrey Cerkvenik, Cecilia Linde

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Heart rhythm, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Leadless Devices: the Future of Pacing.Current cardiology reports · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Enhancing patient acceptance of ICD implantation through structured shared decision making: conversation is key.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Neurohumoral Activation in Heart Failure.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Michael R GoldMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina. Electronic address: goldmr@musc.edu.
Claude DaubertDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital, Rennes, France.
William T AbrahamThe Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Stefano GhioFondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Martin St John SuttonUniversity of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
John Harrison HudnallMedtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Jeffrey CerkvenikMedtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Cecilia LindeKarolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Medtronic (United States) · USCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRKarolinska University Hospital · SEMedical University of South Carolina · USPoliclinico San Matteo Fondazione · ITThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

TRAINING U54EB020404 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI KUMAR, SANTOSH · 2014 to 2018
$11.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB020404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces mortality, improves functional status, and induces reverse left ventricular remodeling in selected populations with heart failure (HF). The magnitude of reverse remodeling predicts survival with many HF medical therapies. However, there are few studies assessing the effect of remodeling on long-term survival with CRT.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to assess the effect of CRT-induced reverse remodeling on long-term survival in patients with mildly symptomatic heart failure.

methodsThe REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic Left vEntricular Dysfunction trial was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial of CRT in patients with mild HF. Long-term follow-up of 5 years was preplanned. The present analysis was restricted to the 353 patients who were randomized to the CRT ON group with paired echocardiographic studies at baseline and 6 months postimplantation. The left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVi) was measured in the core laboratory and was an independently powered end point of the REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic Left vEntricular Dysfunction trial.

resultsA 68% reduction in mortality was observed in patients with ≥15% decrease in LVESVi compared to the rest of the patients (P = .0004). Multivariable analysis showed that the change in LVESVi was a strong independent predictor (P = .0002), with a 14% reduction in mortality for every 10% decrease in LVESVi. Other remodeling parameters such as left ventricular end-diastolic volume index and ejection fraction had a similar association with mortality.

conclusionThe change in left ventricular end-systolic volume after 6 months of CRT is a strong independent predictor of long-term survival in mild HF.

Indexed as

EchocardiographyVentricular RemodelingAgedCardiac Resynchronization TherapyDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedStroke VolumeSurvivorsTreatment OutcomeVentricular Dysfunction, LeftCardiac resynchronization therapyDefibrillatorHeart failureImplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorRemodeling

Identifiers

PMID25460860
PMCPMC4390984
OpenAlexW2013831674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.