Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25460808›Full record

ReviewJournal of neural engineering2015

Progress towards biocompatible intracortical microelectrodes for neural interfacing applications.

Mehdi Jorfi, John L Skousen, Christoph Weder, Jeffrey R Capadona

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neural engineering, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 154 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
154citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

154 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Capturing the Electrical Activity of all Cortical Neurons: Are Solutions Within Reach?Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Implantable Self-Powered Systems for Electrical Stimulation Medical Devices.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Poly(curcumin-Journal of neural engineering · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

94 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mehdi JorfiAdolphe Merkle Institute, University of Fribourg, Rte de l'Ancienne Papeterie, CH-1723 Marly, Switzerland.
John L Skousen
Christoph Weder
Jeffrey R Capadona

Funding

CD14 facilitates neural device integration and performanceR01NS082404 · NINDS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI CAPADONA, JEFFREY R · 2013 to 2016
$1.8M
Novel modalities for assessing the cortical tissue-electrode interfaceI01RX000334 · VA · LOUIS STOKES CLEVELAND VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI CAPADONA, JEFFREY R · 2010 to 2014
–
Resveratrol Prevents Microelectrode Mediated NeurodegenerationI01RX001495 · VA · LOUIS STOKES CLEVELAND VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI CAPADONA, JEFFREY R · 2015 to 2017
–
NINDS NIH HHS 1R01NS082404-01A1NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS082404RRD VA I01 RX000334RRD VA I01 RX001495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To ensure long-term consistent neural recordings, next-generation intracortical microelectrodes are being developed with an increased emphasis on reducing the neuro-inflammatory response. The increased emphasis stems from the improved understanding of the multifaceted role that inflammation may play in disrupting both biologic and abiologic components of the overall neural interface circuit. To combat neuro-inflammation and improve recording quality, the field is actively progressing from traditional inorganic materials towards approaches that either minimizes the microelectrode footprint or that incorporate compliant materials, bioactive molecules, conducting polymers or nanomaterials. However, the immune-privileged cortical tissue introduces an added complexity compared to other biomedical applications that remains to be fully understood. This review provides a comprehensive reflection on the current understanding of the key failure modes that may impact intracortical microelectrode performance. In addition, a detailed overview of the current status of various materials-based approaches that have gained interest for neural interfacing applications is presented, and key challenges that remain to be overcome are discussed. Finally, we present our vision on the future directions of materials-based treatments to improve intracortical microelectrodes for neural interfacing.

Indexed as

Electrodes, ImplantedMicroelectrodesAction PotentialsBrainBrain-Computer InterfacesCoated Materials, BiocompatibleElectroencephalographyEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisNeuronsCoated Materials, Biocompatible

Identifiers

PMID25460808
PMCPMC4428498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.