Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25460669›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental research2015

Use of amniotic fluid for determining pregnancies at risk of preterm birth and for studying diseases of potential environmental etiology.

Laura A Geer, Benny F G Pycke, David M Sherer, Ovadia Abulafia, Rolf U Halden

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Amniotic fluid characteristics and its application in stem cell therapy: A review.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laura A GeerDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, State University of New York, Downstate School of Public Health, Box 43, 450 Clarkson Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11203-2533, USA. Electronic address: laura.geer@downstate.edu.
Benny F G PyckeCenter for Environmental Security, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, 781 E. Terrace Mall Tempe, AZ, USA. Electronic address: bpycke@asu.edu.
David M ShererDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, 445 Lenox Road, Brooklyn, NY, USA. Electronic address: david.sherer@downstate.edu.
Ovadia AbulafiaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, 445 Lenox Road, Brooklyn, NY, USA. Electronic address: ovadia.abulafia@downstate.edu.
Rolf U HaldenCenter for Environmental Security, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, 781 E. Terrace Mall Tempe, AZ, USA. Electronic address: rolf.halden@asu.edu.
Arizona State University · USSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University · USState University of New York · US

Funding

In Situ Sampling Tool for Assessing Bioavailability and Toxicity of SedimentsR01ES020889 · NIEHS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI DENSLOW, NANCY D, HALDEN, ROLF U · 2011 to 2013
$874k
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES020889NIEHS NIH HHS R01ES020889
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amniotic fluid (AF) is a biological medium uniquely suited for the study of early exposure of the human fetus to environmental contaminants acquired by the mother before and during pregnancy. Traditional diagnostic applications of AF have focused almost exclusively on the diagnosis of genetic aberrations such as Trisomy-21 and on heritable diseases in high-risk pregnancies. Since more than 50 anthropogenic compounds have been detected in AF, there is considerable potential in utilizing fetal protein biomarkers as indicators of health effects related to prenatal toxic exposure. Here, we focus on preterm birth (PTB) to illustrate opportunities and limitations of using AF as a diagnostic matrix. Representing a pervasive public health challenge worldwide, PTB cannot be managed simply by improving hygiene and broadening access to healthcare. This is illustrated by 15-year increases of PTB in the U.S. from 1989 to 2004. AF is uniquely suited as a matrix for early detection of the association between fetal exposures and PTB due to its fetal origin and the fact that it is sampled from women who are at higher risk of PTB. This critical review shows the occurrence in AF of a number of xenobiotics, including endocrine-disrupting compounds (EDCs), which are known or may reasonably be expected to shorten fetal gestation. It is not yet known whether EDCs, including bisphenol A, phytoestrogens, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), can affect the expression of proteins considered viable or potential biomarkers for the onset of PTB. As such, the diagnostic value of AF is broad and has not yet been fully explored for prenatal diagnosis of pregnancies at risk from toxic, environmental exposures and for the elucidation of mechanisms underlying important public health challenges including PTB.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureObstetric Labor, PrematureAmniotic FluidBiomarkersFemaleFetal DevelopmentHumansPregnancyRisk FactorsBiomarkersAmniotic fluidEndocrine-disrupting chemicalsFetal origin of diseasePreterm birthProtein biomarker

Identifiers

PMID25460669
PMCPMC4279852
OpenAlexW2066061437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.