Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25460005›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Allogeneic cardiospheres delivered via percutaneous transendocardial injection increase viable myocardium, decrease scar size, and attenuate cardiac dilatation in porcine ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Kristine Yee, Konstantinos Malliaras, Hideaki Kanazawa, Eleni Tseliou, Ke Cheng, Daniel J Luthringer, Chak-Sum Ho, Kentaro Takayama, Naoto Minamino, James F Dawkins and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Generation and applications of cardiac spheroids.npj biomedical innovations · 2025
    Review
  8. METTL14-mediated mActa pharmacologica Sinica · 2025
    Article
  9. Extracellular vesicle therapeutics for cardiac repair.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Cell Therapy With Human ESC-Derived Cardiac Cells: Clinical Perspectives.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Kristine YeeCedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Konstantinos MalliarasCedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Hideaki KanazawaCedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Eleni TseliouCedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Ke ChengCedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States of America; Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences and Center for Comparative Medicine and Translational Research, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America; Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, North Carolina, United States of America.
Daniel J LuthringerCedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Chak-Sum HoGift of Life Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Kentaro TakayamaNational Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Research Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Naoto MinaminoNational Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Research Institute, Osaka, Japan.
James F DawkinsCedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Supurna ChowdhuryCedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Doan Trang DuongCedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Jeffrey SeinfeldCedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Ryan C MiddletonCedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Rohan DharmakumarCedars-Sinai Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Debiao LiCedars-Sinai Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Linda MarbánCedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States of America; Capricor, Beverly Hills, California, United States of America.
Raj R MakkarCedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Eduardo MarbánCedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States of America; Capricor, Beverly Hills, California, United States of America.
Capricor Therapeutics (United States) · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USNational Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center · JPMichigan United · USNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

Training in Advanced Heart Disease ResearchT32HL116273 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI Joshua I Goldhaber, EDUARDO MARBAN · 2013 to 2026
$5.6M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpicardial injection of heart-derived cell products is safe and effective post-myocardial infarction (MI), but clinically-translatable transendocardial injection has never been evaluated. We sought to assess the feasibility, safety and efficacy of percutaneous transendocardial injection of heart-derived cells in porcine chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy. METHODS AND

resultsWe studied a total of 89 minipigs; 63 completed the specified protocols. After NOGA-guided transendocardial injection, we quantified engraftment of escalating doses of allogeneic cardiospheres or cardiosphere-derived cells in minipigs (n = 22) post-MI. Next, a dose-ranging, blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled ("dose optimization") study of transendocardial injection of the better-engrafting product was performed in infarcted minipigs (n = 16). Finally, the superior product and dose (150 million cardiospheres) were tested in a blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled ("pivotal") study (n = 22). Contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI revealed that all cardiosphere doses preserved systolic function and attenuated remodeling. The maximum feasible dose (150 million cells) was most effective in reducing scar size, increasing viable myocardium and improving ejection fraction. In the pivotal study, eight weeks post-injection, histopathology demonstrated no excess inflammation, and no myocyte hypertrophy, in treated minipigs versus controls. No alloreactive donor-specific antibodies developed over time. MRI showed reduced scar size, increased viable mass, and attenuation of cardiac dilatation with no effect on ejection fraction in the treated group compared to placebo.

conclusionsDose-optimized injection of allogeneic cardiospheres is safe, decreases scar size, increases viable myocardium, and attenuates cardiac dilatation in porcine chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy. The decreases in scar size, mirrored by increases in viable myocardium, are consistent with therapeutic regeneration.

Indexed as

Administration, CutaneousAnimalsCardiomyopathiesCathetersCicatrixDilatationEndocardiumFemaleInjectionsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMyocardial IschemiaMyocytes, CardiacRegenerationSpheroids, CellularSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID25460005
PMCPMC4251970
OpenAlexW2033713549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.