Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25459784›Full record

ReviewClinics in perinatology2014

Probiotics and necrotizing enterocolitis.

Josef Neu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics in perinatology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Cost-effectiveness of probiotics for necrotizing enterocolitis prevention in very low birth weight infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2020
    Article
  5. Necrotizing enterocolitis: It's not all in the gut.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2020
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Gastrointestinal Organoids: Understanding the Molecular Basis of the Host-Microbe Interface.Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology · 2017
    Review
  8. Innate Immunity and Breast Milk.Frontiers in immunology · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Necrotizing enterocolitis: new insights into pathogenesis and mechanisms.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2016
    Review
  11. Observational
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Pathogenesis of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis.Pediatric surgery international · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Josef NeuUniversity of Florida, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, 1600 Southwest Archer Road, Human Development Building, HD 112, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA. Electronic address: neuj@peds.ufl.edu.

Funding

Intestinal Microecology, Inflammatory Markers and Necrotizing EnterocolitisR01HD059143 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI NEU, JOSEF · 2009 to 2013
$1.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD059143
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most controversial areas in neonatology is whether probiotics should be provided routinely to preterm infants to prevent necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). This review provides the reader with a brief overview of NEC and current concepts of its pathophysiology, discusses the microbial ecology of the intestine in preterm infants and factors that may lead to a "dysbiosis", summarizes studies of probiotics in preterm infants, elaborates on the need for regulation in this area, and discusses alternatives to probiotics and what is the future for the prevention of NEC.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaMilk, HumanEnterocolitis, NecrotizingHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntestinesProbioticsDysbiosisNecrotizing enterocolitisPathophysiologyProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID25459784
PMCPMC4254494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.