Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25459301›Full record

ArticleTrends in genetics : TIG2014

Pitfalls in the application of gene-set analysis to genetics studies.

Adriana Estela Sedeño-Cortés, Paul Pavlidis

Abstract readLetterComment
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Gene set analysis: A step-by-step guide.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2015
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adriana Estela Sedeño-Cortés
Paul Pavlidis

Funding

Neuroinformatics for gene expression: networks, function and meta-analysisR01MH111099 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI PAVLIDIS, PAUL · 2016 to 2025
$3.6M
Neuroinformatics for gene expression: networks, function and meta-analysisR01GM076990 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI BIROL, INANC, PAVLIDIS, PAUL · 2005 to 2014
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM076990NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076990NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene-set analysis (GSA) (‘enrichment’) is a popular approach for the interpretation of genome-wide association studies (GWASs). GSA is most commonly applied to the analysis of transcriptomes, but from the outset it has been considered useful for any study that provides rankings or ‘hit lists’ of genes. The recent review by Mooney et al. [1] is a valuable resource for geneticists wishing to apply GSA to the output of GWASs. Here we describe some additional points of practical importance if the methods are to be applied and interpreted soundly.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome, HumanGenome-Wide Association StudySignal TransductionGenomicsHumansPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID25459301
PMCPMC5369409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.