ReviewJournal of chromatography. A2015
Microfluidics-to-mass spectrometry: a review of coupling methods and applications.
Review in Journal of chromatography. A, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Low-Voltage Microfluidics With On-Chip Electrospray Ionization for Miniaturized Protein Analysis.Small methods · 2026Review
- Article
- Organ-on-a-Chip and Lab-on-a-Chip Technologies in Cardiac Tissue Engineering.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- PolyJet Three-dimensional-Printed Microchip Devices With Integrated Carbon Electrodes for Neurotransmitter Analysis.Journal of separation science · 2025Article
- 3D printed microfluidic devices with electrodes for electrochemical analysis.Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications · 2024Review
- Monolithic 3D nanoelectrospray emitters based on a continuous fluid-assisted etching strategy for glass droplet microfluidic chip-mass spectrometry.Chemical science · 2024Article
- Review
- Nanotechnology-Based Diagnostics for Diseases Prevalent in Developing Countries: Current Advances in Point-of-Care Tests.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Metabolomics and modelling approaches for systems metabolic engineering.Metabolic engineering communications · 2022Review
- Advances in nano- and microscale NMR spectroscopy using diamond quantum sensors.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2022Review
- Lab-on-a-Chip Platforms for Airborne Particulate Matter Applications: A Review of Current Perspectives.Biosensors · 2022Review
- A Review of Optical Imaging Technologies for Microfluidics.Micromachines · 2022Review
- Droplet Microfluidics with MALDI-MS Detection: The Effects of Oil Phases in GABA Analysis.ACS measurement science au · 2021Article
- Faster, better, and cheaper: harnessing microfluidics and mass spectrometry for biotechnology.RSC chemical biology · 2021Review
- Microfluidic Platforms to Unravel Mysteries of Alzheimer's Disease: How Far Have We Come?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Identifying Candidate Biomarkers of Ionizing Radiation in Human Pulmonary Microvascular Lumens Using Microfluidics-A Pilot Study.Micromachines · 2021Article
- [Recent advances in microchip liquid chromatography].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2021Article
- On-chip mass spectrometric analysis in non-polar solvents by liquid beam infrared matrix-assisted laser dispersion/ionization.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2021Article
- Microfluidic chips: recent advances, critical strategies in design, applications and future perspectives.Microfluidics and nanofluidics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microfluidic devices offer great advantages in integrating sample processes, minimizing sample and reagent volumes, and increasing analysis speed, while mass spectrometry detection provides high information content, is sensitive, and can be used in quantitative analyses. The coupling of microfluidic devices to mass spectrometers is becoming more common with the strengths of both systems being combined to analyze precious and complex samples. This review summarizes select achievements published between 2010 and July 2014 in novel coupling between microfluidic devices and mass spectrometers. The review is subdivided by the types of ionization sources employed, and the different microfluidic systems used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.