Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25458223›Full record

ReviewCurrent biology : CB2014

Deciphering the evolutionary history of open and closed mitosis.

Shelley Sazer, Michael Lynch, Daniel Needleman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current biology : CB, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Dephosphorylation in nuclear reassembly after mitosis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. TheCells · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shelley SazerVerna and Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, and Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Electronic address: ssazer@bcm.edu.
Michael LynchDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Daniel NeedlemanSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, and Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, and FAS Center for Systems Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.

Funding

The Rate and Molecular Spectrum of Spontaneous MutationsR01GM036827 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI LYNCH, MICHAEL R · 1988 to 2016
$5.7M
Understanding mitotic spindle positioning by integrated modeling and experimentR01GM104976 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI SHELLEY, MICHAEL · 2012 to 2015
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM104976-01NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM036827NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM036873NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104976
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The origin of the nucleus at the prokaryote-to-eukaryote transition represents one of the most important events in the evolution of cellular organization. The nuclear envelope encircles the chromosomes in interphase and is a selectively permeable barrier between the nucleoplasm and cytoplasm and an organizational scaffold for the nucleus. It remains intact in the 'closed' mitosis of some yeasts, but loses its integrity in the 'open' mitosis of mammals. Instances of both types of mitosis within two evolutionary clades indicate multiple evolutionary transitions between open and closed mitosis, although the underlying genetic changes that influenced these transitions remain unknown. A survey of the diversity of mitotic nuclei that fall between these extremes is the starting point from which to determine the physiologically relevant characteristics distinguishing open from closed mitosis and to understand how they evolved and why they are retained in present-day organisms. The field is now poised to begin addressing these issues by defining and documenting patterns of mitotic nuclear variation within and among species and mapping them onto a phylogenic tree. Deciphering the evolutionary history of open and closed mitosis will complement cell biological and genetic approaches aimed at deciphering the fundamental organizational principles of the nucleus.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsCell NucleusMitosisModels, BiologicalNuclear Envelope

Identifiers

PMID25458223
PMCPMC4278198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.