Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25457677›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of cell biology2014

Invadosomes in their natural habitat.

Elisabeth Génot, Bojana Gligorijevic

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of cell biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. E-Cadherin Is a Structuring Component of Invadopodia in Pancreatic Cancer.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Tubulin Complexity in Cancer and Metastasis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elisabeth GénotUniversité de Bordeaux, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; INSERM U1045, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; European Institute of Chemistry and Biology, 2 rue Robert Escarpit, 33 600 Pessac, France. Electronic address: e.genot@iecb.u-bordeaux.fr.
Bojana GligorijevicDepartment of Systems & Computational Biology and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Price Center, 1301 Morris Park Avenue, 10461 Bronx, NY, USA. Electronic address: bojana.gligorijevic@einstein.yu.edu.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USUniversité de Bordeaux · FR

Funding

Systems Microscopy Analysis of Tumor Cell Motility in Microenvironment ContextR00CA172360 · NCI · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI GLIGORIJEVIC, BOJANA · 2015 to 2017
$747k
Systems microscopy analysis of tumor cell motility in microenvironment contextK99CA172360 · NCI · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI GLIGORIJEVIC, BOJANA · 2013 to 2014
$279k
NCI NIH HHS 1K99CA172360NCI NIH HHS K99 CA172360NCI NIH HHS R00 CA172360
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Podosomes and invadopodia (collectively known as invadosomes) are small, F-actin-rich protrusions that are located at points of cell-ECM contacts and endow cells with invasive capabilities. So far, they have been identified in human or murine immune (myelomonocytic), vascular and cancer cells. The overarching reason for studying invadosomes is their connection to human disease. For example, macrophages and osteoclasts lacking Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASp) are not able to form podosomes, and this leads to altered macrophage chemotaxis and defective bone resorption by osteoclasts. In contrast, the ability of cancer cells to form invadopodia is associated with high invasive and metastatic potentials. While invadosome composition, dynamics and signaling cascades leading to their assembly can be followed easily in in vitro assays, studying their contribution to pathophysiological processes in situ remains challenging. A number of recent papers have started to address this issue and describe invadosomes in situ in mouse models of cancer, cardiovascular disease and angiogenesis. In addition, in vivo invadosome homologs have been reported in developmental model systems such as C. elegans, zebrafish and sea squirt. Comparative analyses among different invasion mechanisms as they happen in their natural habitats, i.e., in situ, may provide an outline of the invadosome evolutionary history, and guide our understanding of the roles of the invasion process in pathophysiology versus development.

Indexed as

Cellular MicroenvironmentAnimalsCell Surface ExtensionsEndothelium, VascularHumansIntestinal MucosaIntestinesModels, BiologicalMyocytes, Smooth MuscleNeoplasmsNeural CrestCancerCell locomotionCell migrationCell motilityConfocaldevelopmentIn situInvadopodiaInvadosomesInvasionIn vivoMicroenvironmentMicroscopyMultiphotonPodosomesProtrusions

Identifiers

PMID25457677
PMCPMC4262535
OpenAlexW1968426399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.