Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25457014›Full record

SynthesisEuropean urology2015

Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of clinicopathologic variables and biomarkers for risk stratification.

Stacy Loeb, Sophie M Bruinsma, Joseph Nicholson, Alberto Briganti, Tom Pickles, Yoshiyuki Kakehi, Sigrid V Carlsson, Monique J Roobol

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06056791 (An Open-label, Phase I/IIa Dose Escalation and Expansion Study to Determine the Safety and Clinical Activity of an Immune Priming Cell Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 87 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06056791 phase1 / phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

An Open-label, Phase I/IIa Dose Escalation and Expansion Study to Determine the Safety and Clinical Activity of an Immune Priming Cell Therapy (INKmune) in Patients With Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)

TypeinterventionalSponsorInmune Bio, Inc.Ran2023 to 2025Enrolled12ConditionsCancer, Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer, mCRPCArmsINKmune
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prevalence and clinical application ofAsian journal of andrology
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stacy LoebDepartment of Urology, New York University and the Manhattan Veterans Affairs Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Sophie M BruinsmaDepartment of Urology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Joseph NicholsonHealth Sciences Library, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Alberto BrigantiDivision of Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Tom PicklesBC Cancer Agency Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, Canada; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Yoshiyuki KakehiDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Miki-cho, Kita-gun, Kagawa, Japan.
Sigrid V CarlssonDepartment of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Monique J RoobolDepartment of Urology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: m.roobol@erasmusmc.nl.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Optimal Strategy for Conservative Management of Prostate CancerK07CA178258 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LOEB, STACY · 2013 to 2017
$889k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA178258NCI NIH HHS K07CA178258NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextActive surveillance (AS) is an important strategy to reduce prostate cancer overtreatment. However, the optimal criteria for eligibility and predictors of progression while on AS are debated.

objectiveTo review primary data on markers, genetic factors, and risk stratification for patient selection and predictors of progression during AS. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Electronic searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from inception to April 2014 for original articles on biomarkers and risk stratification for AS. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Patient factors associated with AS outcomes in some studies include age, race, and family history. Multiple studies provide consistent evidence that a lower percentage of free prostate-specific antigen (PSA), a higher Prostate Health Index (PHI), a higher PSA density (PSAD), and greater biopsy core involvement at baseline predict a greater risk of progression. During follow-up, serial measurements of PHI and PSAD, as well as repeat biopsy results, predict later biopsy progression. While some studies have suggested a univariate relationship between urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) and transmembrane protease, serine 2-v-ets avian erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog gene fusion (TMPRSS2:ERG) with adverse biopsy features, these markers have not been consistently shown to independently predict AS outcomes. No conclusive data support the use of genetic tests in AS. Limitations of these studies include heterogeneous definitions of progression and limited follow-up.

conclusionsThere is a growing body of literature on patient characteristics, biopsy features, and biomarkers with potential utility in AS. More data are needed on practical applications such as combining these tests into multivariable clinical algorithms and long-term outcomes to further improve AS in the future. PATIENT SUMMARY: Several PSA-based tests (free PSA, PHI, PSAD) and the extent of cancer on biopsy can help to stratify the risk of progression during active surveillance. Investigation of several other markers is under way.

Indexed as

Antigens, NeoplasmBiopsyDisease ProgressionHumansMaleOncogene FusionPopulation SurveillanceProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRisk FactorsSerine EndopeptidasesAntigens, Neoplasmprostate cancer antigen 3, humanProstate-Specific AntigenSerine EndopeptidasesTMPRSS2 protein, humanActive surveillanceGenetic markersNomogramProstate cancerPSARisk stratificationTreatment

Identifiers

PMID25457014
PMCPMC4483277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.