ReviewThe Lancet. Oncology2014
Regulatory and clinical considerations for biosimilar oncology drugs.
Review in The Lancet. Oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bevacizumab biosimilar LY01008 compared with bevacizumab (Avastin) as first-line treatment for Chinese patients with unresectable, metastatic, or recurrent non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: A multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, phase III trial.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Randomized, double-blind study comparing proposed biosimilar LA-EP2006 with reference pegfilgrastim in breast cancer.Future oncology (London, England) · 2016Trial
- Article
- Review
- Retrospective analysis of survival and safety of bevacizumab biosimilar and original drug combination chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- The impact of financial incentives promoting biosimilar products in oncology: A quasi-experimental study using administrative data.PloS one · 2024Article
- Real-world clinical efficacy of bevacizumab biosimilar in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024Article
- Delivery of biologics: Topical administration.Biomaterials · 2023Review
- Maximizing the benefits of using biosimilars in Egypt.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2023Article
- Real-world outcomes among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated first line with a bevacizumab biosimilar (bevacizumab-awwb).Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2023Article
- Biosimilars in Oncology: Latest Trends and Regulatory Status.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Efficacy and safety of MIL60 compared with bevacizumab in advanced or recurrent non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a phase 3 randomized, double-blind study.EClinicalMedicine · 2021Article
- The First 2 Years of Biosimilar Epoetin for Cancer and Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia in the U.S.: A Review from the Southern Network on Adverse Reactions.The oncologist · 2021Review
- Biosimilar Use in Breast Cancer Treatment: A National Survey of Brazilian Oncologists' Opinions, Practices, and Concerns.JCO global oncology · 2021Article
- Efficacy and safety of biosimilar rituximab (ZytuxTM) in newly diagnosed patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Hematology reports · 2020Article
- Improving oncology biosimilar launches in the EU, the USA, and Japan: an updated Policy Review from the Southern Network on Adverse Reactions.The Lancet. Oncology · 2020Review
- Biosimilar candidate IBI305 plus paclitaxel/carboplatin for the treatment of non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2019Article
- Review
- Barriers towards effective pharmacovigilance systems of biosimilars in rheumatology: A Latin American survey.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biological oncology products are integral to cancer treatment, but their high costs pose challenges to patients, families, providers, and insurers. The introduction of biosimilar agents-molecules that are similar in structure, function, activity, immunogenicity, and safety to the original biological drugs-provide opportunities both to improve health-care access and outcomes, and to reduce costs. Several international regulatory pathways have been developed to expedite entry of biosimilars into global marketplaces. The first wave of oncology biosimilar use was in Europe and India in 2007. Oncology biosimilars are now widely marketed in several countries in Europe, and in Australia, Japan, China, Russia, India, and South Korea. Their use is emerging worldwide, with the notable exception of the USA, where several regulatory and cost barriers to biosimilar approval exist. In this Review, we discuss oncology biosimilars and summarise their regulatory frameworks, clinical experiences, and safety concerns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.